all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 76 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Stop just fining these fuckers! They can afford any amount you fine them with. Shut down the service and charge them with crimes or gtfo.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 4 days ago* (9 children)

    Normally I'd agree, but if one of the more populated states fined meta at this rate it'd be a corporate death penalty

    For context - New Mexico has a population of 2,124,222, making it the 36th most populated state in the country.

    That's under 1% of the country. California has 39,355,309... No company currently in existence could survive a 4 trillion dollar fine

    This is huge.. if it goes through

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    This is huge.. if it goes through

    Not really. This is a lawsuit about the whole Cambridge Analytica scandal back in 2016. While the penalties could technically be up to $200 Billion... they won't actually be anywhere near that high.

    Back in August, they settled another multi-state lawsuit for the same stuff... for $18 Billion. And that was for settling with 48 states. New Mexico and Florida were the only two states not included in that lawsuit. There's no way in hell the punishment will be anywhere near $200 Billion for the same actions in a single state.

    The only other state that could continue going after them for these actions is Florida since the other 48 states all settled.

    So this issue is effectively over, and it fizzled out with a slap on the wrist as everyone expected because we don't actually punish large companies in this country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    This is huge.. if it goes through

    Like I said, this is huge, if it goes through

    $200 billion isn't a slap on the wrist, it's a real punishment. Facebook can't just cut a check and continue on, they're going to have to make hard choices if they are made to pay up. Florida alone could still drain the company dry on this case, but more importantly it sets a precedent

    Since we don't have a functioning system of corporate punishment, it's all case law. I'm sure Facebook is going to fight it with everything they have, so it's not nearly over... But if this goes through anyways? That could change things

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    If 43 million violations of the law aren't enough to shut something down, what is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Fuck if I know. We can revoke a corporate charter through an act of Congress for any or no reason, we have trust busting laws that allow courts to split a company, individual states can decide to restrict or kick out a company...

    We have mechanisms to do these things, but we don't really have a system of corporate criminal punishment. It's one of those problems of using an early version of democracy... Courts can fine and impose sanctions, they can prosecute individuals for their part, but as time went on instead of legislating a system of corporate punishment it's just been left to case law

    Which doesn't work out well, because corporations have grown to the point they can dump more way money into legal defense than the courts can put into prosecution

    So the answer to your question is basically that it doesn't matter how much they violate the law, they're to big and too powerful for the courts to handle them with the tools available

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Thanks for the thoughtful answer, but that's all pretty depressing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Yuuup. There's people overseas always demanding Americans take back control and stop the madness...

    It's like, my brother, you have no idea what you're asking. We have so much to fix. We don't even have the mechanisms to fix the foundational problems yet. We are working on it, all of it, while also fighting like hell to avoid letting tens of millions die for easily preventable reasons

    And the world's most powerful interests are fighting every single little step of the way

    So, sorry to depresses you, but I do appreciate the empathy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    As someone who's fight left them a long time ago, and it's not like I had much to begin with, I don't really blame people in America for not fighting more. Lord knows I probably wouldn't be.Those cruel fucks are just so organised, and have so much energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Huh, first time I've heard a reasonably sized fine

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    I assume they will settle for 100mil and a promise to not do it again.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 days ago*

    *could

    won't

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    The federal government has interceded and the new penalty is $1.9 million.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 5 days ago (7 children)

    The could, and probably should, but they won't.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

    People always upvote some form of this comment on every post that contains potential good news. Sometimes y'all need to keep your pessimism to your fucking self. It's exhausting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    Sadly this is not pessimism but just realism. You are free to block me if that's too uncomfortable or annoying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    No, commenting "it won't happen" on every single fucking post is pessimism. Sometimes good things happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago* (3 children)

    commenting "it won't happen" on every single fucking post

    But I don't do that, I can't be blamed for actions of others

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    If it's not you it's someone else, and it's still pessimism. And people still upvote it, because everything is bad, and all good news is actually bad news.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    If you want to stick your head in the sand and hum happy tunes to yourself, give’r. We’ll be up here living in reality where, in fact, most news is bad news for the poor in America. Sorry?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

    You're misrepresenting reality. This article is good news, period. A jury decided Meta was at fault, and this is good regardless of your negative framing or how much they end up having to pay.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 4 days ago

    please don’t settle

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 days ago

    Of which they will pay $10 in Chuck E Cheese tokens

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 4 days ago

    Seize their data centers in the state.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago

    Is there a cap?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    Today: Zuckerberg whispers in Trump's ear. Tomorrow: Trump announces trade tariffs on Mexico and Venezuela.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    This is New Mexico, a US state. Even so, Trump will prob still tariff them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    Facebook denied the claims, arguing the company has adapted its policies since the state’s lawsuit was filed in 2021 and that it removes 99% of content that violates standards. In a deposition played for jurors, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company had robust systems to determine whether content should be taken down.

    Yes, standard violating content like ads for a play with content from Virginia Woolf. Feminism is for sure "standards violating content" in a fascist state.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago* (1 child)

    And they could even pay that off in 200 easy instalments!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago

    Funny you mention that, oil companies at least typically pay the first payment or two on fines then stop paying and the feds let it slide. Or in shitholy states like ND they get the state courts to lower the fines to nothing after attention has died down.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago

    That's why all these tech guys are licking trump's cankle holders. Like calls to like.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    If the media mafia can argue like this, so can Mexico.

  • source