top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 138 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

Apple used to brag that its products just work. Now your expensive Mac comes with a bloated AI experiment you didn’t request, can’t fully remove, and are expected to thank Tim Cook for. When customers start writing tools to delete your flagship feature, that’s not innovation.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Wasn't it always Apple's position: "We know better what users need and if we don't have some feature it just means that users don't need it"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

    What's really crazy is that apple had this obnoxious attitude that "they know what users really want", the users would disagree, they'd complain loudly, then they'd use the software and say "damn... Apple was right, this is better."

    But... That was all before 2010. I can't think of a single software innovation the company has had since then. Apple used to deliver overpriced, outdated hardware and they only managed to sell it by packaging it with the slickest OS on the market. These days the situation is reversed, Apple is developing their own silicon, they have some of the fastest consumer chips around, and they need it, because their software is nothing to write home about and their prices are still high.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    They did some commendable things involving locking phones when lost/stolen/seized by cops.

    They’ve also done some typical tech monopoly things with os bloat, slowing down old hardware and poor support for older hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    I think you're right about that. Apple's policies around user privacy and security from authorities are generally pretty good, certainly better than average for tech companies.

    And... Apple has kind of always been monopolistic, and that hasn't changed a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 32 points 3 weeks ago

    The lack of AI was actually a huge selling point for me with the Neo (even though the price was already a huge sell). It's a shame that they're now falling for the same trick as the rest of the industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    It’s John Apple now!

    (Tim Cook resigned. John Ternus is the current CEO of Apple)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    What if it's a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes "Tim Apple"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 120 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    TLDR: it's a """news""" article about a Reddit post and does not remotely represent the average Apple user

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    Apparently an unpopular opinion here but I highly appreciate the move by Apple to embrace local AI. Sure it’s not perfect in any sense, but I like the direction.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 20 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    Same here. Local is not the problem. Control is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    I’m curious what this tool does that is different from turning off Apple Intelligence in the Settings because they already give you some degree of control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago*

    The problem is there is no single switch to turn it off. You have to go to each nook and cranny in the settings and toggle a switch. And if you miss anything, that 20 something gigabytes of space doesn’t free up. I’m all for local AI features, but it should be a one toggle switch to turn it off or remove it.

    The reddit user featured in the article had to create a script to automate it and keep it off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    You can't turn it off anymore in Golden Gate. It is a mandatory download (in countries where it is supported) now.

    You can still disable some specific AI-related features, but you can't block the models entirely.

    I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, that's a ton of disk space, and Apple is notoriously chintzy when it comes to storage. On the other hand, I do want the default to be local-only models, and giving developers easy access will make that the path of least resistance. Most of my problems with LLMs don't apply to moderately-sized local models.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    chintzy when it comes to storage

    Across the line, the cost to get a step up from 512gb to 1TB is $300, and on top of that, 1TB to 2TB is an additional $500, and you’re forever locked in. If that AI model increases in size, yikes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Even for the off-device stuff it usually gives a direct answer, without fluffing up the user, and almost always mentions double checking validity or speaking to a professional for advice (such as medical advice).

    I don’t need to tell people here how terrible AI like ChatGPT is at confidently misleading people and pretending to be a users friend.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I highly doubt it. Knowing apple users its a small minority of technical users doing this while rhe rest of users happily outsource thinking to siri and apple intelligence

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    The only people I know who use macOS are technical in a domain

    I don’t know where the reputation of Mac users don’t know how to use a computer comes from

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago

    I know one single person who uses a Mac as a personal device that isn’t involved in some sort of deep internet technology field. He works in biotechnology and got tired of wasting time and effort on Windows problems.
    As for the rest? They use windows systems every day for work, where they’re often either fixing the internet or fixing people’s windows computers. They just prefer Mac for personal use.

    I’ve begun to feel like people who trash talk Mac users are the ones who aren’t technically capable - or at least not adaptable. I can fix almost any Mac or Windows issue, and can muddle through most *nix problems. I just don’t want that to be my identity. I got more important things to do.
    I’ve had the same MacBook Pro for 5 years now. I code on it, do graphic design, 3d model, play Steam games, and obviously use it as an internet device. It’s never given me a problem, and I imagine it’ll keep going for at least another 3-5 years. It’s fucking awesome, and “just works.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    My parents have used Macs exclusively for the last 20 years or so because they don’t require much technical knowledge. Before ChromeOS, smartphones, and tablets, they were the closest thing to an internet appliance. Most Mac users I know fall into that category. Heck my dad and older brother were both very capable and knowledgeable with PCs but Macs are so frictionless that they no longer feel like they need to know how it works. It just works.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (4 children)

    I’d love for a law that made it illegal to use “X users” and require absolute numbers.

    Is all rage bait. 500 real users on a forum isn’t a useful cohort.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago

    The selling point for me when buying apple products was the shitty implementation of AI. That was the USP. Now they partnered with google so yeah… I don’t use google in my daily life, degoogled a long time ago, don’t want to come near them with a ten foot pole and the new AI shit is actually reskinned Google…

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    What! This is outrageous! Or Acceptable! I don't even know anymore. Thanks Algorithm!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    The T14 gen 6 is pretty upgradable and you can replace windows with Linux.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Yes, there are dozens of them. Dozens!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    For those Windows users who stumbled on to this post.

    https://github.com/memstechtips/Winhance

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    I wish I could do the same on iOS...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›