this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
1011 points (99.3% liked)

News

30363 readers
2949 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 30 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Where the fuck were they during the election?

[–] EstonianGuy@lemm.ee 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Dumbfucks believed the orange guy who was sitting in front of the billionaires. Lets not forget that a third of the us isn’t capable of reading above the 6th grade level.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 4 points 4 hours ago

It's more about lack of Critical Thinking Skills than anything else.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It ain't about "having too much". Billionaires shouldn't exist. Ipso facto, their very existence only shows that corruption and greed can influence anything to point that whatever that thing is only serves those corrupted. End it. There should be no Billionaires.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

In other words, a billion is too much money for one person to have.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's the POWER that a billion bucks holds that's dangerous. We now have numerous billionaires with enough money to negotiate their own terms with foreign governments, without regard to how it might affect America as a whole. Eventually, world-wide power will be held by the Sociopathic Oligarchs, and instead of countries regulating THEM, they'll be regulating the countries to suit their own selfish purposes.

And eventually, that will lead to Sociopathic Oligarchs making conflicting demands, and they'll end up going to war with each other, with countries and citizens caught in the crossfire.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

And this is precisely why a billion is too much money for one person to have.

[–] PlagueShip@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In related news, 28% of Americans are complete and utter fucking morons.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

28% of Americans think they are billionaires that are just suffering a temporary financial setback.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 2 points 4 hours ago

"If it wasn't for those Democrats, we'd all be rich!"

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Anytime there's a shitty statistic, it's often always around 25-35%

[–] avattar@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In my experience, around 57% of statistics are made up.

[–] SupaTuba@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago

So 1/3 people completely fuckin sucks. This tracks with my anecdotal data

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The survey only involved like 950 people and it only defined it as, "the rich" which seems pretty vague. Given the survey also mentions Bezos and Musk it wouldn't surprise me if that is the group having too much on this survey, not humble millionaires like you and me.

[–] bluesheep@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't forget all of the people who will certainly be millionaires in the future! They will definitely not be middle class and delusional for the rest of their lives

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 1 points 4 hours ago

The difference between a million and a billion is about a billion. So even millionaires look like pathetic poors to Billionaires.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Middle-class people will be millionaires.

$1M equates to $40k/year income in retirement at a 4% SWR (safe withdrawal rate). In 2025, that's not actually a lot, even if you have Social Security on top of it.

If you're not a millionaire by the time you're retired, you're damn near impoverished. The only way for that to count as "middle class" (in the "close to the median income" sense) is if the middle class is destroyed (in the "existing separate and distinct from the lower class" sense).

(INB4 somebody chimes in with "it never was separate and distinct" -- yeah, yeah, I know, working-class solidarity and all that. But you get my point, right?)

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

72% is way too low given how insane the current wealth distribution is. Fully 1/4 of the population have drunk the kool-aid

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

"I'm going to be rich, soon" they say while they're considering payment plans for a Taco Bell order.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blackbearjesus27@lemm.ee 117 points 1 day ago (15 children)

And yet, about half of voting Americans will actively ignore those impulses and choose a party that openly campaigns on tax reductions while it drums up fears surrounding issues they largely agree with (when presented in a non-partisan context) so does it really matter what they say?

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (5 children)

45% of voting age Americans didn't even fucking bother to vote

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, a lot of them decided the genocide half way across the world was more important than the genocide they would help to trigger back home.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

And also that somehow Trump wasn't so much fucking worse on the genocide halfway across the world, despite his close cooperation with and endorsement from Netanyahu.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 61 points 1 day ago (5 children)

6% said "the poor have too much"

wat

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are you not aware that poor people have smartphones these days? Back in my day being poor meant having absolutely nothing. I say we take their phones away and their shoes too for good measure. That way they’ll know what true poverty is like /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

friendly reminder, it would take 1,460,714,285 weeks of minimum wage to earn musks net worth. That's 27 million years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 day ago (9 children)

There are more poor than rich. We just have to come together. There is strength in numbers.

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

No way. Americans are proud they are not communists, meaning they complain but ultimately worship the rich

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)

No they don't, their voting clearly shows the opposite.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

"Donald Trump stands up for the little guy like you and me" - the mental giants we're dealing with

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] imTIREDnhungryboss@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

no shit Capt. obvious

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The rich have too much by definition, but billionaires in America have an historically obscene amount of wealth. Wealth inequality in today’s America has surpassed pre-Revolution France.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›