Chromebooks fucked a generation of kids? Kids got cheap, hard to break, up to date, easy to replace laptops which ran a full desktop and even offered a Linux and android subsystem. Certainly not perfect but better than alternatives like the iPad or Windows S.
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
1183 points (90.8% liked)
Enshittification
2923 readers
251 users here now
What is enshittification?
The phenomenon of online platforms gradually degrading the quality of their services, often by promoting advertisements and sponsored content, in order to increase profits. (Cory Doctorow, 2022, extracted from Wikitionary) source
The lifecycle of Big Internet
We discuss how predatory big tech platforms live and die by luring people in and then decaying for profit.
Embrace, extend and extinguish
We also discuss how naturally open technologies like the Fediverse can be susceptible to corporate takeovers, rugpulls and subsequent enshittification.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I agree, and I think it takes almost MAGA level self-absorption to contrive this interpretation of events. What actually happened was somebldy wanted to sell products and came up with products people wanted. And that's not an all-encompassing endorsement of Google and everything Google has ever done because I'm "on Google's side", it's a criticism of OP's imagination.
It’s this and it’s not. Chromebooks don’t give kids anywhere to explore outside of chrome and handheld devices provide a controlled environment. A lot of kids (and adults!) are operating with a tablet in place of a computer because the most intensive thing they need to do if they’re not gaming is word processing. It’s big tech overall and the internet shrinking down into like 3 companies.
As someone who lives and works online. I wish.
It seems super consolidated, right up until you start listing the "handful" of big vendors that run the Internet..... You get passed the first 3 or 4 big players and end up with a long list of "of yeah, these guys too"....
Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, CloudFlare, valve (and every other game publisher), Netflix, PayPal, Uber, Spotify, Apple, Yahoo (yes, they still exist), xitter, Rackspace, zoom, Dropbox, Etsy, Pinterest.....
The list is super long.
And that's just companies that people would have heard of. The companies that actually make the Internet work is a much longer list, and GoDaddy plays a surprisingly large role as well. There's also entire business sectors that most people aren't aware of, for network transit services, and interconnects.
It's a pretty deep topic.
I don't believe that.
It's likely because the market has consolidated to a small number of companies who can dictate the means of production and how their consumers interact with their product.
When the personal computer market was young, entries from all sorts of manufacturers flooded in. Some failed, some succeeded. Everything had to be configured by the user because universal standards hadn't been developed yet. This allowed for some people to be exposed to the back end, which have them some understanding of how their technology worked. It enhanced problem solving skills.
If anything, 'Plug and Play" probably had more involvement in enshittification than Google. Taking out the problem solving and moving the goal to consumption.
So the argument is that because Chromebooks just work and don't need troubleshooting unlike windows so this is Googles fault
OK
A certain group of Boomer-brains are heavily invested in the idea that Millennials are the only generation that knows how to use computers.
So we've been seeing a lot of "blame the X for the Y" agitprop that's increasingly divorced from reality. It's just the next generation of outrage porn, tailored towards the current generation of 40 year olds.
FOX News ran the same bullshit content for GenXers and Boomers.
No, the argument is that Chromebooks are so limited in what they can offer that kids never learned to do anything out of using the chrome browser.
Turns out you don't need to worry about troubleshooting something if you just remove that functionality lol
Most Chromebooks offered Linux on them. Even Linus Torvalds used a Chromebook when travelling to develop via it. Presumably because he was sick to death of "troubleshooting" when he had other, better things to do. And presumably schools and teachers also have better things to do than deal with bs like conflicting packages, missing drivers, viruses or whatever on every kid's device.
All Chromebooks ARE Linux. ChromeOS is a Linux based operating system. Whether or not you can get to the lower level is a different discussion. I had one of the first Chromebooks, you have always been able to root them and do what you want with them.
You are correct that most chromebooks can have Linux installed on them.
I don't think that's relevant in a discussion about Chromebooks in a school setting - were schools encouraging their students to install Linux?
Doesn't matter if they encourage it or, not, the option is there. So if kids want to mess around, compile stuff, run Linux games they can totally do it. The main purpose of the laptop however would be to do work, save / submit stuff to the cloud, run all day and be cheap so if it gets stolen or broken it's less expense to replace. I think in that role the Chromebook is the best solution anyone came up with. And there were a long line of contenders.
Is the option actually there, as in it's allowed by school policy? Would you be able to show an example confirming this?
I highly doubt a school IT department would be okay with this. The very post were discussing asserts that it was marketed to schools as something that can be locked down.
I'd also argue that even if it was allowed, whether or not it was encouraged undoubtedly matters.
These are kids we're talking about, not engineers. Additionally, were discussing technical competence at the generational level, so we'd have to rule out outliers, which I'd handily believe "kids who installed linux on their school Chromebooks" would fall under.
I don't have my Chromebook to hand but I believe the setting is in the Prefs. When you set up Linux it's a virtualized Debian that you can pretty much do anything with but it can't mess with ChromeOS outside. Not all Chromebooks support it since it's space / CPU dependent but if it does then it's Linux. I was even running graphical apps since the screen is a Wayland server.
I don't....think that answered my question?
Would this be against school policy? Are there examples to confirm this?
They don't need to know how computers work if Chromebooks are the only thing in existence.
They also don't need to know how to deal with python dependencies if they can pace their code into AI and say why isn't tkinter working?
Craftsmrn said the same thing about the industrial revolution.
You know how you know even less about computers? When you cannot afford one at all
That's why they only know what Chromebook offers, they have them in school.
My kid's school doesn't have any kind of computer instruction, no computer lab, it's all Chromebooks.
Is it your genuine belief that your schools would have computer instruction and big easily accessible labs if not for Chromebooks?
I remember "teach kids computers" as an educational panacea during the 80s/90s. It made Micheal Dell very rich, but often at the expense of the biology, chemistry, and physics lab programs. "Nobody knows how to use a blowtorch / dissect an animal / build an engine anymore" was a refrain I heard all the through my high school years.
Has eliminating computer labs brought back the old 70s era Space Race science programs? Or are we still just boiling away ever ounce of the public system that costs money (except athletics, of course)?
I was simply stating why the kids only know Chromebooks. Many poor communities, mine and myself included, have households that don't have computers at home.
The schools give each kid a Chromebook at the beginning of the year. So it's the only computer access these kids get.
There isn't instruction on how PCs work on a base level in my kids middle school, and no computer lab to experiment with. So they only know how to navigate Chromebooks, because that's their access level
And I mean, They got rid of home economics for the computer lab back when I was a kid. I don't understand why you brought up the 70s or whatever, I'm aware times and education instruction changes sure, you don't need to be rude.
The schools give each kid a Chromebook at the beginning of the year. So it’s the only computer access these kids get.
Plenty of kids have access to desktops and laptops through their parents. Libraries also have computer labs with traditional PCs.
There isn’t instruction on how PCs work on a base level in my kids middle school
I've never heard of a school that provided middle school computer education outside of small elective classes, and even those only in wealthier districts.
That's honestly technology in a nutshell. Technological development leads to further abstraction, leading to less low level knowledge. It's always been this way. Is AI an abstraction step too far, or are we just the next generation of old man yelling at cloud?
AI has value but first a reality check. Most of the time it produces code which doesn't work and even if it did is usually of terrible quality, inconsistent style, missing checks, security etc. That's because there is no "thinking" in AI, it's a crank handle using training and some rng to shit out an answer.
If you know what you're doing it can still be a useful tool. I use it a lot but only after carefully reading what it says and understanding the many times it is wrong.
If you don't know how to program everything might look fine. Except when it crashes, or fails on corner cases, or follows bad practice, or drags in bloated 3rd party libs, or runs out of memory on large datasets or whatever. So don't trust anybody who blindly uses it or claims to be a "vibe" programmer since it amounts to admission of an incompetence.
I asked myself that question a lot.
When cloud first became a thing I yelled at the cloud a lot. Then I got on board with provisioning. And they stepped up the game with load balancers that actually have features security groups SSL unwrapping.
No I realize that one person with a cloud account can do the work of three or four of system engineers.
If you know what you're doing, you can definitely do this hybrid of vibe coding and real coding. You can't just give it a problem and tell it to solve it you need to tell it exactly what you're expecting it to do. Occasionally you can ask it if it has any suggestions and it'll come back with something that you didn't think of that's not a half bad idea.
That said, there's a lot of idiots out there with zero skill just vibr coating stuff they have no business doing leaving vulnerabilities and caution to the wind.
Before AI we used to refer to the "vibe coders" as "script kiddies". People who would find a chunk of code and apply it to a job without really knowing what it did.
Fine when they were working alone and what they were up to wasn't your problem. But as soon as you got into a team project, the code base would start filling up with these patchwork, confused, inefficient solutions to systemic problems.
You'd have the same bug in three different places and you'd have to run down the flaw over and over again, because someone was just copypasta-ing a solution wherever it would fit.
Finally someone who is sane & smart
This seems silly. Lots of kids never learned about computers even when they were available. A chromebook was just an electronic school aid. If the interest was in computers they would learn about computers.
I think this is a fairly dumb take. In the schools that I saw that had chromebooks a kid might be taking English, Math, AND computing. It really was up to the school (and parents) to introduce computing, not the machine that was the general replacement for books.
Anecdotally: a high school near us requires every student to have a computer. They do not hand out chromebooks and the requirement specs are a higher end Mac or PC laptop that the kids are required to bring to classes. These kids use blender, maya 3d, office suite, video and music editing software for example. They absolutely do not know any more about computers then chromebook kids (with a few exceptions). Having access to a computer doesnt magically make them know about how computers work.
The real take is to get kids into PC gaming from a young age. Kids are super patient with each other and now my kid is doing things like installing mods for games that he plays. It's also massively improved his reading which is mostly how I learned English myself.
Probably a great way to get them comfortable with pc hardware too - want that new GPU? Here you go. Install it, you just get the one so be careful and learn how to do it right.
I can thank Minecraft for making me learn how to use the computer because I wanted to install mods and for learning English because Minecraft let's plays were like crack to 10 year old me and basically all of them were in English
Nah
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan of big corporations, but Schools are gonna have to be using Device Management programs regardless of what OS they use (so that kids don't play video games, or use social media, or watch adult videos, in the classroom). Giving kids a Managed Windows Laptop with tons of restrictions does nothing to "improve tech literacy" either, so just as bad as a chrombook.
Also, wealth is also a factor. If you only have money for one device, and everyone has a smartphone, and you kids are gonna get socially ostricized in school for not having one, of course you're gonna prioritize giving them a smartphone first, which in turn, delays them learning how to use a computer, and I mean like a computer you actually own and can modify however you want, as opposed to the school-owned managed device. (Its harder to learn that when you're older)
I am pretty confident it's the smartphone OSs (Android and iOS) that are more at fault. I remember having to install a file browser on my smartphone. Kids grown up with smartphones may not even know there are files and folder structures.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is kinda a bad take imo. I don’t think it’s chrome books that has ruined tech literacy. Maybe it’s younger exposure to even more addictive social media than previous generations?
I’m pretty young. My first mobile device was an iPod touch 4th gen. I figured out how to jailbreak it and I was like 12 at the time. If I ever felt one of these walled garden devices was holding me back, I enjoyed finding a creative solution around that. Since that iPod touch, I jailbroke my Wii and recently a kindle. I also modded a gameboy, but that was different than jailbreaking.
load more comments
(20 replies)
Back in my day we brought our own MS-DOS boot disks to school to circumvent all the limitations.
For me it was Backtrack Linux on a bootable CD-RW. Set the Windows wallpaper as my background and nobody ever noticed. Man those were the days!
This is an incredibly dumb take. Tech isn't one dimensional and there isn't a "right" path to tech literacy. I grew up on Windows and I learned a lot of what I know by exploring my laptops and learning new things out of necessity. I ended majoring in CS in working in tech. My sister, who's 5 years younger than me, had Chromebooks growing up both at home and at school, yet she's also a very proficient CS major. Using Chromebooks doesn't show that someone is bad at tech, that's just a baseless assumption.
Chromebooks are just another branch of tech, and there's really nothing wrong with them. They're basically Android tablets in laptop form. Google giving them to schools at a deeply discounted price is not a bad thing. Without them, many schools wouldn't have any sort of tech for their kids to work with. Chromebooks are incredibly useful tools that can enable teachers to incorporate material from the internet into their lessons and help streamline their work.
Hating on things for the sake of hating on them is just lazy and counterproductive. There's a lot to criticize Google for, Chromebooks are not one of them.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I feel like this has way more to do with smartphones and apple than chromebooks but sure.
load more comments
(8 replies)
I think it's a bit harsh to lay all the blame on google, considering the iPad exists.
Same shit different bucket.
load more comments
(34 replies)
view more: next ›