this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
4 points (83.3% liked)

Not The Onion

15809 readers
921 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nothing quite says “high-performance muscle car” like a popup ad for a Mopar Extended Warranty covering your whole center console. That’s right, Dodge Charger owners are now experiencing an exciting new feature: pop-up ads that appear every time the vehicle stops at a light. This absolute garbage feature was spotted in the wild, take a look here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bellingdog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hey so I'm getting this thing on my new Charger, I think it's a check engine light?

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

I laughed pretty hard, thanks for that

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I think I know who’s responsible.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This literally happened to Jeeps a month ago.

“It should also be noted that ads are part of your contractual agreement with SiriusXM, but we are working on the frequency,” replied a Jeep Cares representative. “Thank you for your patience.”

A Stellantis spokesperson told Fortune in a statement that “a temporary software glitch affected the ability to instantly opt out in a few isolated cases, though instant opt-out is the standard for all our in-vehicle messages. Our team had already identified and corrected the error, and we are following up directly with the customer to ensure the matter is fully resolved.”

Fool me once, Stellantis...

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

Companies sure so have a lot of "glitches" and "technical difficulties" when they're introducing controversial features that forces it on a group of people, only to be nearly immediately removed with all kinds of excuses..... And then the feature is forced for everyone within a few months.

Almost like it's NOT unintentional, they're NOT experiencing technical difficulties, and they're actually just testing the waters before diving in, with neatly 0 intent to pull back unless the consumers put upenoigh of a fuss the company execs get scared.

[–] ErinCrush@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I will not buy or watch anything with ads. I can't stand ads. Ads represent everything wrong with the US and capitalism. Just not stop shit shoveled into our faces.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Did you know John Deere tractors have a dedicated piracy scene? Because the tractors require authorized technicians to service them and doesn't allow farmers to service them themselves, spoofed firmware has appeared and is fairly frequently used to bypass this.

My point is, if you can jailbreak a tractor you can jailbreak a car. Just a matter of time.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We dun fucked up when we made tarring and feathering CEOs illegal.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why? Well, probably because Dodge badly needs the money. The brand’s U.S. sales plummeted 29% in 2024

This'll help sales, I'm sure.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Stellantis looking at all that blank ad space on your infotainment console: "It's free real estate!"

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Capitalism is an ouroborus

[–] applemao@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stop buying new cars until they remove this bullshit. We can go 40 years with existing cars without buying a single new one.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The cost of used cars isn't much better assuming you don't want a piece of crap. After almost being killed by 2 used cars I'd prefer to not risk it anymore.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Subaru has great safety ratings and the "used Subaru tax" (as in, a used Subaru tends to be more expensive) is because they are very good cars. They have some of the best safety ratings on the market.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Welp every manufacturer that shows this should go down immediately upon first offense.

Not even kidding, this should be corporate suicide.

Dodge and Jeep are (well Jeep already was tbh) both firmly on the "actively speak out against" list. If I was in a place of hugely inflated power, I would dismantle the entire company, and sell it to whoever that company likes the least.

This should honestly be a brand ending scenario in less than 5 seconds after the first ad. CEO should be in the bread line TODAY from getting hit with this.

ABSOLUTE zero tolerance. There are no valid arguments against this and I will die on this hill.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

This should be punishable by firing squad.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Jeep and Dodge are both owned by Stellantis :) It's one shit-circus out of ~~France~~ the Netherlands (corrected because apparently I don't know geography).

On the good news front, the market is beating them like a rented mule. Dodge alone is down 29% in sales year-over-year.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had never heard of Stellantis until the comments on this post.

That's at least a little good news, but I want day-after total zero existence for stunts like this.

As in executed the day after murder kind of immediate punishment. In this case, total, irrevocable punishment.

C suite people literally living in shelters fighting for leftovers at a food bank after paying out years of employee salaries and benefits kind of punishment.

You can't just fine people like this for crimes. You have to actually take away money and the ability to accrue more than enough to live on.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Wow, if you’re this fired up about car dashboard ads, wait until you hear what Google’s been doing with your data.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I'm not exactly happy about that either.

I was trying to stay on topic about this. That's a whole different rant.

Plus, things spread before they get worse. This is a line that shouldn't be crossed by anything in any way. The inside of my car is a nice little island. It should stay that way.

I feel pretty much everybody would agree with that. Even the ones open to it probably just want to make the money from it without having to deal with it themselves.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Dodge alone is down 29% in sales year-over-year.

"Clearly we need to add more AI, internet of shit, microtransactions and advertising on the cars to compensate!" - Stellantis CEO

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually, Stellantis has their global HQ in Hoofddorp, Netherlands.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

You are... very correct about that!

I somehow got my wires crossed and assumed that the PSA Group (who got rolled up into Stellantis) was still the home base. Thanks for the correction.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty much everyone asked for this with their actions and choices as consumers. Lucky us, we can still choose not to buy a Dodge Charger or a Swasticar.

[–] thebluehood_380@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It’s def gonna spread tho. This is just one model one make. For now. In 2, 5, 10 years? CP77 without any of the fun shit.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stuck in traffic......introducing, the all new 2025 elantra! Hyundai has done it again! We all known it sounds like sentra but they keep making new elantras every year! Now just 54,978.73 with a 56% Apr amortized weekly!

Papa pa pa paaaa! I'm loving it!

New on the McDonalds menu!

Thanks for listening to 100.7! Your friends Krissy and tushy.

Avocados from Mexico!... Now just $4.50 extra on every taco!

Donate to Snt Vincent's cousin Alfredo Medo. Every year thousands go hungry without a proper apply wristwatch...

At Von's club we're family!

You've arrived! Welcome home! Don't forget the two dildoes on your Amazon cart! The pink one is Christina's favorite. Antonio loves the blue one because its gir....door slams!

Hatchback opens.....when you open up a new Coke check under the cap to win a trip to Eldorado! ...hatchback slams!

[–] commander@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's sad is a significant amount of people have simply been conditioned to accept that level of noise in their lives.

If things are quieter and they aren't getting products shoved in their faces 24/7, they become visibly uncomfortable.

[–] r4venw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

The quiet means you have to deal with your own thoughts and theyre certainly not going to do that!

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As an unfortunate owner of a Chrysler and having owned and driven a ton of other cars I can confidently say Stellantis makes the shittiest cars you can buy in US. On screen ads are just a small piece of an immense garbage island that is this shitty company.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I forget where I heard or read it, but there was an anecdote about a guy that worked for Toyota engineering in a department that would purchase competitor vehicles to disassemble them and see what they were up to, like what kind of innovations they were adding. They didn't bother with chryslers because the most they'd gain was new ways to design a car to be difficult to maintain or repair.

My friend had an early 00s intrepid and would always bring up needing to remove the passenger tire and wheel well to replace the battery any time car maintenance was brought up.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

My wife's first car was a Dodge Stratus. It was the worse. It had a battery leech and I couldn't find what was leeching power. She was stuck on the side of the road and I bought a battery to try and save her and didn't realize I was also needed to remove the front passenger tire.

[–] eric5949@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is why I'd rather rebuild my 30 year old civic's engine than buy a new car.

[–] joe_archer@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That seems like a lot of hassle if you're then going to buy a new car anyway.

[–] eric5949@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would i be buying a new car anyways? I don't want one, the newest car I'm even interested in purchasing in the future is over a decade old. I just drive my wife's car when I work on mine.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

He was making fun of a light grammatical error in your post.

You said 'I'd rather rebuild the engine then buy a new car'

What you meant was 'I'd rather rebuild the engine than buy a new car.'

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any minute now one of those brave-browser idiots will be along to tell us all how great ads are because they can make us aware of products that we had not yet discovered or remind us of products we didn't know were near by.

[–] HamsterKiller666@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What does this have to do with brave-browser users?

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Brave derives revenue from advertising.

Brave devotees are the only people I've ever seen defending advertising as a user friendly revenue model.

[–] HamsterKiller666@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had no idea lol I use brave just to avoid ads which is why I'm confused.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Brave is involved in a crypto scam and is backed by conservative evil fuck Peter thiel

[–] HamsterKiller666@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd suggest you change to Firefox, but they have made some... troubling changes to their privacy policy recently, so it may be a good idea to use a debranded port of it instead.

I already mainly use Firefox, BUT I need a browser that supports client certificates (aka mutual TLS). The desktop version does, but not the mobile one.
Also, once in a while, I need to do something through a shitty website that simply doesn't work in firefox but does in a webkit/blink.
I usually just blacklist those and never come back, but sometimes it's something I can't avoid like taxes or gov related bs.

If y'all got a good suggestion, thanks

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Afaik that's mostly FUD and was debunked.

I'm still not happy with Mozilla throwing money down the AI toilet.

If there was a debunking, I'd love to see that. I know Mozilla spun some damage control talking about how the change in terms didn't really mean anything and was strictly for legal compliance, but, well, I've heard that one before.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

I've seen no debunking. Have you got a link for that?

Not saying you're wrong, just that I've not seen it :)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] commander@lemmings.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I've noticed brave users are some of the biggest useful idiots on the internet.

I genuinely think there are 2 classes of brave users: people who are invested in the company trying to viral market it, and the morons who fall for it.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I use it on my mobile devices to avoid youtube ads. Because i’ve yet to find a better way to avoid them on a tablet or phone.

If you have a better option for iphone/ipad, i’m willing to try it.

load more comments
view more: next ›