What about joe? Because the engineer who bootstrapped the project mistakenly put his name as the mainline branch and we realized it far too late during the lifecycle and the team decided to keep the branch name because it's hilarious.

Branch on every commit. Never delete. If something needs to be rolled back, merge it back into HEAD. Conflict resolution only through melee combat.

HEAD

It's master3. Don't question it!

prod

“live” didn’t make it onto the list, I see.

Boring answer: older repos are master, newer ones are main. I've worked at companies that did other things such as having the prod branch be a branch called prod.

hunter2

🤡 for master

👽 for test

💩 for dev

Chaotic Evil should be the current sha hash.

belay your panic. even mommy cannot save you.

"testing"

don't wake up. fourth row just dropped.

Develop should be Chaotic Evil.

"test"

Feel like lawful evil fits better for master

It's goshujin-sama

Yall have multiple branches?

"fuck it, it''s friday"

release

"Untitled"

Production made me lol

Uhh, Daddy, obviously.

qa.

All development happens in feature branches. Someone other than the original developer needs to build and test the feature on our development servers. If successful it gets merged into qa, where it gets built and tested against it qa servers. Production build are tags on qa.

nowadays, mommy

Moab is “mouth over anus & balls”.

Some of my repos on github use either main or master.

Latest

branch (i always commit directly to the main branch so i only have one, so why bother naming it. also YOU CANT STOP ME FROM DOING IT BWAHAHAHAHAHA)

develop

Develop

Khorne

Hey Linus did you merge my branch into mommy? I really want to get it out.

Our development branch is "working", then we have specific dated snapshots where we run our datasets through our programs.

Main is QA. Production is release branches.