top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 169 points 1 year ago (28 children)

I love Borderlands, but I really wish Randy would just shut the fuck up.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think he thinks he's Jack in The Pre-Sequel, but really he's Jack in Borderlands 2.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [+] 102 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How does someone with such a shitty personality and dress sense get so smug?

    Lots and lots of money.

    If I looked and acted like him I would want to punch myself in the face

    He has top of the line security details to do that for him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 80 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    So a 4070 is a leaf blower to this asshole.

    Well I'll gladly not buy this game then.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 70 points 1 year ago

    Considering Randy REALLY wants you to pay $130 USD for this game, I'm not shocked his performance advice was "be less poor"

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago

    A game that looks like BL4 shouldn't run like Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing turned on.

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Dude really felt the need to insult his customers. He could have said it’s a premium game for premium machines, but instead he decided he wanted to insult people who can’t play it and suggest they are less than the premium people who can.

    2K needs to get this nut away from the mic.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Hot take, Borderlands was never really a good franchise. Yeah I played through the second game, but i did so once, and never wanted to return to it afterwards.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 50 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's nice, he is kind enough to tell us that we should not buy his game if we do not have a monster gpu. He is only excluding a very small portion of gamers after all !

    Let's look at the Valve's hardware survey.

    Wait...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe try optimizing your game before releasing it?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    So… I shouldn’t plan on playing this on a Steamdeck when it gets down to $19.99?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It's poorly optimized UE5 slop. Looks like shit, plays like shit.

    Hard pass.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's sad that a lot of devs just make their game and then slap frame-gen on it and then release it. Like who cares about optimization. Not that I blame them, people still buy those games full-priced, so...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 37 points 1 year ago

    In other words:

    "We don't want to put resources towards optimising our product. We don't care if the methods we built our product with make it more difficult to use, while regressing in several key visual aspects. The burdon of our shortcomings will be placed on the end user, who will have to spend their resources to out-power them."

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago

    borderlands

    premium

    lol

    lmao

    rofl

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    Sucker game made for sucker gamers.

    Are you inclined to blame yourself for the obvious failings of a gaming corporation? Smash that buy button now!

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What a total dick. Lots of people with high end PCs are all saying how it runs like shit, so what's the next excuse?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    I'll play something cheaper then

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    I guess I'm not premium enough to give you my money, Randy.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago*

    I am a premium gamer; if you want me to play your premium game, you'll need to subscribe to me for $29.99/month or $324/year (that's a 10% discount from the month to month!)

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Nah I’m not gonna pay $80 for unoptimized copy-paste spyware my man thanks

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Is Borderlands really all that popular still? Like I remember seeing the first few games everywhere, and people talking about them, but that was years ago. I realize I'm biased but I would expect to hear something about them...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • 2 was where the series really peaked. The first did some new things, and brought some fresh life into the shooter genre.

    2 expanded upon it, and had a much better story. It was also in the heyday of matchmaking game lobbies, so it was easy to boot up the match finder and jump into a game with someone. Probably half of my Steam friends list came from playing this game and just vibing with people on voice chat while we ran through the side quests.

    The prequel was… Alright? I’d put it about on par with the first game. It didn’t bring anything new or exciting to the table, but it was good at what it did.

    Then 3 was just bad. It felt really cringey, in a “how do you do, fellow kids” kind of way. Like it was trying too hard.

    And now 4 sounds like more of 3. The game sounds rushed, and the CEO’s attempting to cover for that rush makes him sound woefully out of touch. There’s no good reason that cel-shaded graphics should require a 5090 to run smoothly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I guess I will stick to my "non-premium" games made by devs who actually care about providing experiences worth experiencing, instead of a checklist-driven, committee designed and overpriced games that are most AAA games.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I played lots of borderlands 2 with my friends back in the day it was pretty fun.

    Three came out, played it for a bit, but it was just more of the same and somehow worse. Then I watched that God awful movie.

    I think I'm over the franchise, but maybe here in a few years I'll pick it up for $5 in a summer sale.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I was planning on picking up B4 when the GOTY edition goes on sale for $20-30 couple years from now. I figured performance issues will be solved by then. Now I think I'll pass.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Bought it to try n Linux. I don't have the greatest video card but I can play Dune: Awakening, Helldivers 2, Monster Hunter Wikds, Avowed, Black Myth: Wukong...

    Borderlands 4 was stuttering on the barely animated character select. I lowered settings all as low as possible and it was still unplayable with delayed/missed input and stuttering.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    "we haven't optimised this at all, lol, $80 please"

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    That's the thing, Randy, we aren't interested in a monster truck, we just need a car. A 5090 is not a leaf blower, and your game looks more like a clown car than a monster truck given the way it runs. Thanks for telling us that you are basically only interested in whales, although I can't imagine they are happy either regardless of how they've probably thrown money at you already.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Such a bad argument. There is no reason for the game to not support lower end hardware except for lazy development. Not a good sign for the future of borderlands. This is also the type of game that really sucks if you don't get a locked 60 FPS. Borderlands 3 is still a laggy mess on my steam deck. Sometimes it just stutters forever. Constantly generating shaders or something. There is no reason for it to be that way and lowering the setting has almost no effect on the actual performance. This is 100% the fault of the devs. They are pushing half complete products to market not the consumer.

    Also as many others have stated, not everyone has $4000 to drop on a PC. My most powerful machine is a Skylake processor with a 1070. It runs most games fine, it's just the handful of unoptimized unreal engine games that run badly. I have nearly limitless options to buy other games from devs who actually care about us poorer folk. A 4070 ti is like 800-1000 rn. Probably won't even run this game well. This is in an age where we have had nearly 100% inflation in a few years. Most people can barely afford to buy a car without spending half of their paycheck. They should be trying to make their games work on older hardware now more than ever. Ram is cheap, there are some things you can work around. It's usually not worth it to target low RAM devices, but there is really no good reason for you game to not scale well to lower end GPUs. You don't have to have only 4k textures on disk. You can easily automate a process to create lower poly, and lower resolution textures, implement modest lighting systems. It's pretty easy in relation to other things. Cpus are mid, you shouldn't necessarily target 10 year old CPUs if it's going to make the game worse but your game shouldn't be so unoptimized that you need 5.5 ghz on a single core to get 60 fps. You should at least have a proper lod system in place so that you can support lower end GPUs in many cases where it's not very difficult.

    The issue with many of these modern triple AAA games is they are trying to avoid as much work as possible. They are trying to avoid targeting lower end hardware because it's a bit of work and they are struggling to finish their games. They need to plan for these things from the start and work them into their process.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    I can't decide if the explanation that "our shitty game is made for premium gamers" is more or less absurd than EA charging 80 bucks for a game with most of its characters still locked would "provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment".

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Eh. I didn’t even finish borderlands 3. won’t bother getting 4

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    There aren't enough monster truck owners to support his game. If he gets his wish, Gearbox is going to lose a whole lot of money

    The reality is that it is a mass market game. It needs mass market adoption. Currently much of the market is locked out due to performance issues

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So anyway, you guys excited for Hades 2?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›