i just really hate snap

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 70 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I always read 'did not finish'

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I used to work at the devil and I heard DNF from players all the time. Once I realized DNF was the package manager in fedora (recent switch) I never forgot the command again. It's burned into my brain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

    I've been specifically avoiding Ubuntu because of snaps, instead preferring Ubuntu derivatives that don't use it, like Mint and Pop.

    And more recently, trying an entirely different approach with Arch.

    And yes - I could get rid of snaps in Ubuntu if I wanted. But everything is just a little more annoying when you are going against the conventions of your distro.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    You could try Debian, it's basically Ubuntu without snaps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I could.

    Though I suppose it may be semantically more appropriate to say that Ubuntu is Debian with snaps (and with a bunch of other stuff too)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Thank you! It always irritates me when someone does say Debian is Ubuntu but without XYZ... No, Debian was first. Ubuntu is a Debian child that got molded into something that no Linux should ever be..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It's made even worse by some software pretending to be Ubuntu builds but just quietly installing a Snap version instead.

    Looking at you, Firefox. πŸ‘€

    Switched to EndeavourOS a couple of years ago as my main, and its been amazing. No regrets.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I just don't see the point of them when there are flatpaks. I'm not super knowledgeable on Snaps so maybe there's some huge benefit I don't know about, but they always just seemed like a worse version of flatpak to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The huge benefit (to canonical) is that they control the store/repo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I don’t see the point of flatpaks when there are appimages.

    Anyway last I heard snap has terminal/server apps and more system interaction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What I like about flatpaks over appimages is that they will get updated, be included in the application list, and not live inside my Downloads Directory

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Until recently, I've had no real preference as mostly using RHEL clones at work. Now using Ubuntu...and snap has been causing issues.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I have ubuntu on my server and I really need to switch it. It's such a dick move when you apt install something and it opts for a snap. I just roll my eyes and groan when I think of having to back up EVERYTHING (music, media, dockers configs, compiled projects, random projects, etc) in order to switch the distro. I dont' have the time to do it. It's like nearly 2TB worth of stuff.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Isn't the default installation of Ubuntu to BTRFS? In which case, you should have an @ subvolume with Ubuntu that's mounted to /, and an @home subvolume that's mounted to /home.

    Make a new subvolume, install a new operating system into it, and choose that subvolume in the bootloader, should be able to have Ubuntu and 'your favourite OS' (I use Arch btw) living side-by-side with the same home directory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What’s snap? I use LMDE and i don’t think i have that.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's Canonicals' package manager. A lot of people, myself included, dislike it mostly because the backend is proprietary and it locks the repository to Canonical only. Also given their past history, it may be doing something nefarious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    When our powers combine we become....! Ah shit! I need yo reinstall, the snap is reading from the apt folder again!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    So, I'm a novice Linux user and have been on Ubuntu for maybe 2 years now. And I'm just starting to hit the SNAPS wall - IE, just a bit too much of what I want doesn't install through snaps. Is there a good progression for my "next distro after Ubuntu?". Still need some training wheels, but ready to take the next step.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [B] 4 points 1 year ago

    It's fine Snap, I didn't need to be able to set a default browser or connect it to other programs anyways ☺️

  • source
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί