this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
276 points (89.9% liked)

PC Gaming

12850 readers
1009 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImminentOrbit@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Your choice as Valve here is to either delist or not be in Russia. It is easy for me, as someone not in Russia, to cheer Valve to fight the good fight. But, it would suck if I were in Russia and suddenly lost access to my games.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is the most sane take I've seen. It's honestly weird how ignorant this thread is, regional censorship is not new. Australia has a habit of banning violent games. The Middle East and China have a habit of censoring all sorts of things. Many countries have their own laws of what is and isn't okay and they fluctuate all the time. My friend in Germany couldn't play Wolfenstein because any games with Nazi imagery were illegal until relatively recently.

Literally every company that operates in those countries also censor their stuff. The only reason this article exists is because [thing but Russia] gets more clicks and outrage compared to [thing in fifty other countries]. You're free to hate Steam for it but this isn't weird or exclusive behavior. They're running a business.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flippinfreebird@lemmy.today 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I don't know why it's news at all. It happens in every other country with any amount of censorship, US included.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jazzkoalapaws@ttrpg.network 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But, it would suck if I were in Russia and suddenly lost access to my games.

Another reason not to rely on steam as a central point of failure.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Not a defense, but aren't a lot of the steam games at least runnable without the front end?

Not as much as GOG obviously, but some ?

[–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

Lots of indie games yes, but not so many of the AAAs

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 6 days ago (12 children)

I wonder if the same people who say Steam should pull out of Russia would agree that Steam should also pull out from the US. I mean, that's what should happen given the basis of the arguments being used, right?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If the US opposes values Valve has then they should.

I’m not going to pretend Valve cares about these causes though.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yes. Maybe then people will blame the ones actually responsible. If it makes overthrowing a magat government more likely, it's good on principle

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Yes. Once the bread and circuses are gone, people will have lots of hunger and free time to ruminate on how hungry they are.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Which steam games have been removed by the US government?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It's called "complying with the law".

[–] horse@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago

Strange then that Google and Apple didn't take it down. Valve made a choice and not a good one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago (5 children)

So, human rights stuff aside, how/why the fuck do we need a genderised solitaire?

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 31 points 6 days ago

Because the dev wanted to make it and other people wanted to play it.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Its a free card game with paid or grind to get skins. One of those skins is a rainbow camelion.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

it's art. the question should be "why not" and the answer is "no reason".

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Someone wanted to play a game like it, and someone else coded it and decided to sell it. Capitalism. You may as well ask the question, "Why does porn exist." People can't have sex whenever they want, with whoever they want, so a wank with some NSFW material solves the problem. A demand results in someone realizing they can make money meeting the demand.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It seems to be one set of cards, as a part or a deck. Its pretty much a nothing burger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

These comments are shit. Who said that you should comply with Russia's laws???

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

People who love valve more than human rights

[–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

Money, I guess. GabeN needed a new yatch

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Surprised to not see it linked. Warning: despite being free, recent reviews point out how they’re pushing a monthly subscription to get all the cosmetics.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/3690460/FLICK_SOLITAIRE/

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

no good sides huh

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

It's just sad.

load more comments
view more: next ›