you looking at this while trying to decipher it means you're the third member of this staredown

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 123 points 10 months ago (46 children)

Why have I got the suspicion this is fetish content of some sort

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 10 months ago (41 children)

    Because she's 8, depicted as wearing a thong, and the picture is insinuating that she wants an animal to squirt water at her vagina and asshole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] 109 points 10 months ago (23 children)

    Well I'm an oblivious idiot. I thought she was caught literally with her pants down by a wild Pokemon wandering under the stall door and was determined to still catch it anyways

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    I thought the giveaway here was that the Pokémon is named "Bidet", but all wild Pokémon are named whatever their species is ("Piplup"), meaning this one is already caught and was given a nickname by its trainer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    my biggest boomer opinion is that there's only 151 Pokemon's, the rest are mental diseases. I won't learn the name of any Pokémon beyond the original 151.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I too like performative anti-pedophillia! I too like describing images of fictional characters in the most gross way possible! It doesn't have a negative effect on real-life at all, it's not like there are people who think small breasted women are pedo-bait (save for Collective Shout, who are obviously just a rare anomality and it's not like they managed to convince the Australian government of their bullshit), because everyone knows the real problem with pedophillia isn't the long-lasting psychological harm caused by adults fulfilling their desires on people not being able to consent, but attraction to "child-coded" things! And it obviously never was used against LGBTQ+ people!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    I mean... I can see why people are weirded out by this, but also... it really doesn't have to be a sexual thing.

    You could put Ash, or Silver or whoever in this position... its... not like guys cannot also use bidets... and its not like the concept of running out of toilet paper, or using a bidet, is inherently sexual.

    Sure, it can be, if that's actually your fetish.

    But it doesn't have to be.

    What, she has a semi risque, bikini type thong thing, as underwear?

    Uh... when I was the age of this character (10-12 apparently, depending on which game she's in)...

    I would stand at the bus stop for school, and one neighborhood girl, same age as me, would brag about wearing one of these, have it hiked up past her pants/shorts waist line, and keep trying to get me to do dares or favors so I could 'see more of it'.

    I was also friends with less uh... attention seeking girls, and a few years later, I'm getting invited to their slumber parties (mostly to marathon a season of Buffy, sometimes Toonami, eventually Venture Bros) because I'm actually respectful, trustworthy, and keep my hands to myself.

    What I'm trying to say is:

    What this character is depicted as wearing was not an uncommon kind of girl's undergarment bottom, even 20 years ago.

    Not all girls wear granny panties.

    Its not inherently sexualizing, to be wearing a fairly common kind of underwear.

    I think the point of this is to be embarassing and awkward... 'cringe', even... not fetishistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Wrong type of cursed content. To be honest, I thought it was implying that she was out of toilet paper, and was going to use the poor penguin. Then I read the name.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 55 points 10 months ago

    it's got a penguin, therefore it's about linux, therefore it's political.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    In her defence the toilet paper is out.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 21 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Not getting blastoise out for that job?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 10 months ago

    I dont like this.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago

    awww she's happy to see you

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    How silly of the artist to keep the tiny, black panties in

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Do you take your underwear entirely off? Or just drop em around your ankles? Doubly so if you still have shoes on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    An excellent question. I suppose it depends on the type of shit. Is it an easy-going stroll in the park? Probably wouldn't bother to drop 'em below the knees. The kind that makes you pray to any god that might hear you? My panties are off, my shirt is off, and my dignity is gone. Hope that helps

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Sure, just treat it like it's non-sentient.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    src🔞
    I knew that artist’s name started w/“K.”

    I miss /c/blursedimages

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    who fully takes off pants but not underwear? or skirt? I don't remember the character's outfit but I'm imagining shitting while wearing a skirt pulled over my chest with my underwear around my hairy legs now so thanks for that I guess.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    This is just completely barbarically wrong. There's no wayThe floors would be that clean with the walls, covered in a pee pea spray

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    "I'm hungry"

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›