uis

joined 2 years ago
[–] uis@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  1. Performance is often more tied to the code than to the interpreter - an O(n³) algorithm in blazing fast C won't necessarily perform any better than an O(nlogn) algorithm in Python.

An O(n³) algorithm in Python won't necessarily perform any better than an O(nlogn) algorithm in C. Ever heard of galactic algorithms?

The overhead my classmates had dealing with poorly optimised code that caused constant cache misses was far greater than the interpreter overhead in my code (though at the time I don't think I could have explained why their code was so slow compared to mine).

Did they write naive linear algebra operators?

[–] uis@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are decades of articles on c++ optimizations, that say "use empty() instead of size()", which is same as here.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Arson, murder and jaywalking

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Unless they want dividends

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Stock isn't revenue.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

USA is East Alaska.

[–] uis@lemm.ee -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

EUSSR, the country of healthcare and public transport.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago
[–] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

Derp. You are right.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago

Ubisoft's stocks aren't ubisoft's assets. It is opinion on how much they worth, not how much they have.

 

"I didn't have to be in this place, I didn't have to record this video. In my place should have been another person. But this person was killed by Putin."

view more: next ›