top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 187 points 2 years ago (36 children)

I want to see the answers on the right.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 273 points 2 years ago (26 children)

    Just have to zoom out a little, nothing to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 107 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    From the last answer, it sounds like they would only need to turn in their SIM card.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Should have run the responses by the staff member nobody likes to play against on board game night.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Better response than the teacher's:

    Points for trying, but your series of questions are irrelevant non sequiturs.

    Phones are banned, not just your, or any other particular physically manifested instance of the sublime, intangible, transcendent ideal of 'a phone'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 181 points 2 years ago (46 children)

    Banning cell phones in school while school shootings are a regular occurrence is top tier decision making

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 99 points 2 years ago (25 children)

    Students can keep a phone in their bag if they really need it. The fact that we ever allowed kids to scroll instead of paying attention in class is absurd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    My kids school “boxes” phones if you’re caught using them or they interrupt class. They lock them inside a clear plastic case and let you carry that.

    This avoids liability because the kid still has possession of their phone and can still see an emergency text or call. The can’t interact with the phone but can get a teacher to unlock if there’s a visible emergency text

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    “It’s fine if it’s in a bag and off or silent” has been cell phone policy in my experience (decades ago).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That's the policy at most schools. Actually enforcing that in the face of a classroom of kids who don't respect the rule? That's a much bigger problem. They're a lot more clever at sneaking them out than you would think. Moreover, if the phones are just feet from them, their presence is never out of mind. They're a constant distraction even in a bag. Phone apps are literally designed to be addictive. Imagine if we had a rule that said "crack pipes are fine in your bag. As long as you don't take them out and smoke in class, you're fine." Even if we lived in a world where crack somehow was legal for minors to have, how effective to you think that rule could be enforced?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (18 replies)
  • load more comments (20 replies)
    [–] 156 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    Thankfully, there's an official standard for using the internet with just carrier pigeons: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 97 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    "...this technology suffers from extremely high latency."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 136 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    That kid who asked about radios should be given a scholarship to a STEM degree. Also the kids who asked about using smoke signals and pigeons have mad creativity. The stock kid? Well he probably has more financial accumen than most Wallstreet punks.

    The kid with the replacement dilemma? Forget philosophy. That is lawyer material right there.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    That reminds me of my previous work. We couldn't but PCs from our project budget, because they are classified along furniture (because they should outlive the duration of a project), but we can buy replacement/repair parts. So yeah... Enough replacement parts make for a new PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 113 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm with the Smartphone of Theseus guy. 🤣

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 96 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not the Ship of Theseus in the last one ☠️

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    I often forget that while young people aren't usually too wise to the ways of the world, that doesn't mean they're not fucking smart!

    Woke to this reading a senior (high school) paper of mine 35-years later. Figured it would be childish. Holy shit! I wrote that at 17?!

    Now if I could get the brain plasticity back and tack on the wisdom, I'd be a beast brain. :(

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 42 points 2 years ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [+] 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago* (4 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Banning phone and not gun is wild

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think if you sold off your stock before it became public information you’d be in deep poopie doopie.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    So dance, fucker, dance.

    Thats the wrong song, uh? Jay commited suicide?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›