you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 265 points 2 days ago (22 children)

Fuckin' door is inside out.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Lmao I was going to say "it could just be a cut-through visualization", but... No it couldn't. This is VERY clearly portraying the interior side of a door. On a car with a very weird and obstructive pillar shape, no less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (12 children)

    These luddites will find the smallest details just to complain about AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    How about you tell us the benefits of these details, since you're pro slop;

    Multiple generative 'AI' companies were caught using real photos of real people and child abuse victims to generate csam, including musk's grok. They responded by hiding it behind a paid version and then lobbying to make it legal in the US.

    Entire states are doubling their water and power consumption by running data centers for these llms advertised as 'AI' to the general public

    Mass surveillance is being enabled globally by automated facial recognition software, online post tracking/analytics/bot accounts and mass media disinformation campaigns provided by the products these companies push.

    Some of the surveillance software provided by these 'AI' companies is being used to support an actively genocial apartheid system.

    Multiple war crimes, such as the bombing of Minab school and multiple targets in Lebanon were facilitated by these products sold to the American military as infallible target designators.

    Multiple llms are also directly responsible for actively leading users into suicide, to which the companies responsible for the chatbots said "they signed the terms of use"

    Which of these details do you agree with?

    Edits- Leaving this up because I stand by what I said, but I now know Laser was taking the piss, so bravo to them for getting me good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (8 children)

    What a depressing amount of downvotes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago* (6 children)

    I hope it's some irony we didn't get because i am gettin disappointed from lemmy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Yeah, it was. I just don't like putting "/s" or something on posts because what good is sarcasm if you're not upsetting anyone?

    If someone thinks getting substantial aspects, like the side of a car door a mirror is on, wrong, are "smallest details" (which my post implies), they're dumb. Simple as

    I was kind of expecting people to misunderstand it (no offense to anyone, I kept my stance somewhat vague on purpose) but I was hoping that it was so absurd the majority would get it :D

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Ohhhhhhhhh. In that case excuse the previous tirade.

    Unfortunately I'm one of those people who needs the '/s' because this level of absurdity is nothing compared to some of the 'you just dont like the new technology' arguments I've seen online from slopsuckers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment