top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 1 day ago

Gas stations are...already a drive-thru?

...?!!

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 1 day ago

    We should put electric motors on sunken door handles with plastic gears to achieve 0.01% more efficiency.

    Bonus: they stay safely locked in an accident because you should not trust EMTs with your valuables.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 day ago* (20 children)

    I can't believe I need to state the obvious here, but this is over and above all of the other extremely valid objections already raised by others vis-a-vis turning the door you sit right next to into an ersatz Molotov cocktail that weighs an extra fifty pounds.

    How is this going to help gas stations become drive "thru?" (I see we still also haven't learned how to spell "through.") It's going to allow the gas station to do what, exactly, stick a nozzle in the side of your car?

    That's already how filling a modern car with fuel works.

    (Yes, I specified modern because otherwise at least one pedantic nerd is going to go "well acktshully" and mention any of the various cars from the '60s and '70s which had the filler hidden behind the license plate or brake light or an emblem on the trunk lid or whatever. We already know. Nobody cares.)

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Ok this gave me a good chuckle. I then thought “ oh but you could make it so gas station attendants just stand/sit outside and fill up cars as they come “ but then I realized this would also be possible today, and I started laughing even harder. Besides ensuring that every little fender bender ends in painful death, there’s literally 0 purpose to this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    Hate to break it to you, but both "drive-through" and "drive-thru" are considered correct.

    Wikipedia refers to "A drive-through or drive-thru (a sensational spelling of the word through)..."

    As explained on Erin Wright Writing, "According to our primary American-English dictionaries (Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, Webster’s New World College Dictionary, and The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language), drive-through is the preferred spelling, while drive-thru is an accepted informal variant. However, the use of drive-thru has become so common that using drive-through now feels incorrect."

    Also keep in mind this is Xitter, where abbreviations are are a normalized (often necessary) part of the lingo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 265 points 2 days ago (22 children)

    Fuckin' door is inside out.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Lmao I was going to say "it could just be a cut-through visualization", but... No it couldn't. This is VERY clearly portraying the interior side of a door. On a car with a very weird and obstructive pillar shape, no less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)

    I mentioned elsewhere that AI is really making people tell on themselves, in terms of how smart they are and how they see the world. It's handy.

    Hunter here thinks that a piece of real-ish looking conceptual illustration is all it takes to prove that something is a viable concept. It's like watching a mecha anime and wondering why we haven't got our shit together to construct building-sized robots.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    This isn't even one of those sounds good on paper ideas.

  • source
  • [–] 118 points 2 days ago* (3 children)

    put the gas tank your car inside

    How is babby formed?

    Edit: Also, how do you roll down the window?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 days ago (28 children)

    Ignoring all the safety concerns. Wouldn't this make the door heavier and rase the center of gravity. Also where is the window going to retract to. There would need to be multiple tanks all balanced. I don't think the tank placement is an issue for car designers.

    Issue was solved and someone is trying to find a novil idea from AI to justify the cost. LLMS don't understand what a car door is or what filling the car involves.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Batteries in the doors for EVs act as explosive reactive armor.

    - military tech bros

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 60 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    The problem I have with these "natural selection" jokes is that shit like this will kill other people.

    And like, yeah it's funny and all until it actually happens. We are currently witnessing the results of DOGE gutting regulations and agencies in the US. Food getting recalled left and right They just extended the hours truckers can drive in a day. They've been slowly rolling back child labor laws sunce Trump's first term.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    Now hold on, isn't this like airbags, but then with explosive power instead of lame air?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    All this negativity... I, for one, for endorse this for those who love Ai. Don't listen to the nay-sayers, guys! Go build this for your car, and do it soon!

    This is like when people said the Cybertruck wasn't amphibious. What a bunch of idiots. Of course it is, and everyone who listened to those idiots missed out on a primary feature of that vehicle for the gods. That finisher car.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 72 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    How is this different from having the gas cap on the side of the car?

    Is the idea you don't have to get out?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    Keeping aside the obvious hazard, what exactly was going on in this guys head? How does putting tank inside doors help?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)

    Hi, my name is Pinto Jr.

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    The second coming of the Ford Pinto has been foretold

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    There's already a way to make refueling a drive thru, it's called paying $10 to the gas station man to do it for you.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    do these fucking assholes just like think learning about history is stupid or something? like gm literally did this and it was a disaster.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 6 points 1 day ago

    It's advertising my Millennial Retirement Plan.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 days ago

    This is rage bait, right? Right?!

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    How even do they expect this change to make drive-thru gas stations possible? They are already as drive-thru as they can be and the opening to fill the tank is already on the side of the car.

    Instead, what we ought to do is have massive refuelling tankers just cruising around and we put the fueling port on the front so we can refuel mid-drive like a fighter jet.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 days ago* (2 children)

    Clearly the Ford Pinto and Saddle-tanked Chevrolet trucks are old enough for people to have forgotten about why we don't.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    D-AI-rwin awards?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    An idea like this, assuming it's not ragebait, would probably never leave the confines of this person's imagination and the AI's chat history. By the time you get to the point where you would send a design over to a fabrication shop, there would be too much skin in the game for somebody to not speak up about how dumb it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 22 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Gas stations are drive thru though.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    Well, just like any other idea that would definitely lead to fewer carholes in existence...I'm in favor of it.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›