Picture of the night sky captioned: "WinRAR is more profitable than OpenAI"

all 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 7 months ago (1 child)

That isn't a fair comparison. Winrar has been here for decades, while OpenAI is relative new. Give OpenAI 2 decades of time and we can then see it loss 5 trillion dollar.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Fewer people have been driven to suicide by WinRar

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Well maybe OpenAI has only made 0 dollars now. But, give it a few years and its sure to make at least $000,000,000,000.00.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago* (8 children)

    To be honest I am more profitable than OpenAI. My salary covers my expanses and I still have some money left at the end of the month. Can Sam Altman say the same about OpenAI?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    Can you also hallucinate bad advice for free, or is that a subscription service?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It's free, but I might start including ads in my hallucinations soon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Sam's Altman can definitely say that his salary covers his expenses and that he has money left over at the end of the month. Open AI has been very profitable for him. It's just not profitable as a company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    WinRAR sells a successful and effective product to companies. AFAIK, their main business is B2B.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    What do they sell? WinRaR is not a good application

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I can name 2 o 3 corpos (big ones) who regularly renew their WinRAR license. And that repays it abundantly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
    [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I really love desktop applications. They do their job, you install it and it's done. And you can work towards next version and such while people can decide to not upgrade.

    Now everything is cloud, they only maintain one version, they can change it whenever, you can't get any say, and have to always agree on their policies. And have Internet connection.

    If I could make money making desktop applications, I would love that job. Everything is web and AI now

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Honestly I like well built web apps better. They are install once, use anytime anywhere.

    The main thing though being that it's self hosted, self managed. Fuck the "service providers" that will try to steal your first born of they can

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Winrar never made me go crazy and kill myself

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The time I put some money to see how options worked and lost it all was more profitable than OpenAI. I only lost some $300.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    I considered sharing my own choices that led to lost money, while still more profitable than OpenAI...but there are just too many.

    Edit: Here's one - that time Homer Simpson bought a mint condition copy of Amazing Fantasy #15, and then ate it - was still more profitable than OpenAI.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    The Metaverse is was more profitable than OpenAI. Pets.com was more profitable than OpenAI.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Did they ever found that guy that bought that WinRAR license? It's one of a kind and must be worth a lot more now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    I'm that guy, or i was like 25 years ago!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I really wonder how many people pay for LLMs. I used to have my company pay for one product but that was company money. hard for me to believe I would've ever spent my own money on that. Unless it was $20 a year instead of $100, I guess then maybe I would have. I think the fact that every tech company is cramming LLMs for free into every product is a sign that most people wouldn't pay for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Yeah, I also wonder who's actually willing to pay for this shit. Even with ai generated 'art' unless you need large volumes, it's probably cheaper to just go on fiver and hire a real artist to make something for you

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Not only more profitable, but more valuable as well. Not that it's particularly valuable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    I'm more profitable than OpenAI. Just me, working my shitty, dead end job.

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    AI: here are some numbers you asked me for. 7 , 554, 90871, 3.1425, 276, -4, 1155. If you tell how you gonna use them I can make a preformatted document. Do you want me to make a year staterment of your bookkeeping? Or name a country and i provide a random phone number from there.

  • source
  • parent