I'll never understand the hold whatsapp has on people
post
The only American software I run is FOSS. I've got no problems with FOSS devs of any country. American corporations are the swollen sore on your lip you keep biting. Get rid of them and the world's your oyster.
I kinda feel like all dumb phones have to do is ship with an Signal client, the lack of WhatsApp was apparently the driving reason why the reporter went back and I think its more reasonable to expect friends to move to Signal than to SMS. (Its also really unsecure)
There are a couple of community made clients I wonder how hard it is to implement the signal protocol.
Signal is American too though
True, but itโs not owned by privacy enemy and trump slave Zuckerberg, or a similar big tech bro
That still does not help you if Trump finds out the server can just go offline to pressure other countries.
The only thing that helps is using something not tied to the US.
Use open standards. For example you could use https://conversations.im/
I mean tbh it feels like the EU is putting more pressure on private chats than America does, at least right now. I am not sure how things are in Asia. I think the bigger problem is their reliance on AWS if Bezos or some friend of his does not want Signal to be a thing they can probably just switch it off fairly easy.
To be fair, I recently discovered RCS messages. Very cool. I've been using those quite a bit recently and with many people I do not need Whatsapp anymore.
You can't use RCS without Google, though.
Can't use WhatsApp without Meta. What's your point?
The point is not relying on US tech. It's in the title.
I did try RCS with a couple of friends and its great.
The only problem I have with it is the same I have with WhatsApp is that I cannot make sure what is happening on the server side (or even on the client side for that matter if its closed source) and what they are doing with the meta data. It seems like they would still be able to map out with whom I talk to and when (even if the content is encrypted which is not the default with RCS i believe).
Messages are end to end encrypted, I believe it is by default.
Google definitely has some metadata if you use the android app, at the very least the list of your contacts.
Regarding who you talk to, maybe: messages do not necessarily go through the servers of Google, it depends whether your carrier has their own servers.
Either way, I do see this as a great advantage over Whatsapp: while this system is still mostly controlled by Google the underlying technology most definitely is designed for decentralization and I know quite a few carriers are beginning to support it.
It's open. Just compile your own client. Though it's be allowed on the Signal network. So you have speed up a server too. American and open isn't a problem.
I am confused as to why they went with a dumb phone. Why not go with a non american degoogled android phone? Or to even go a step further, get a sailfish OS powered phone.
The narrator did not want to buy things just for an experiment.
Notice this sentence (emphasis mine):
On that first morning, with my iPhone shut off, I reached for a Nokia brick from Finland.
Pardon me if I am being presumptuous but the title seem to imply that the author was going to use somewhat equivalent non US alternatives rather than rummaging through what they already own.
To use an analogy, it is as if you have an article titled "I survived 72 hours without eating processed foods" and the author opted not to buy non processed alternatives and just work with with whatever they have at their home. Then you learn it was a couple of onions and a tomato they had in the fridge. If they say they were starving by the end of the experiment, it does not really paint an honest picture of how hard it is to get by without processed foods.
So much to unpack.
Trying to live without U.S. tech, I would find out, essentially amounts to trying to live without tech at all.
No. It's just different tech. I for one live with a lot of tech, but no US tech at all.
You know, it's possible to research products before choosing it. It's not necessary to live in a cave just to avoid US tech.
This sentence makes it sound like an impossible that should not even be started, which it isn't.
The so-called dumbphone is the type of device now enjoying a second life among people detoxing from screen time and is also a favorite of drug dealers seeking to avoid getting busted by any tracking and data collection.
This fails to mention that dump phones still lead to metadata collection nerwork-side, using it for drug dealing is just dumb. Drug dealers that are a bit more smart would use Signal and perhaps a Google-free Android ROM.
I did notice that I was pacing up and down my flat because my usually overstimulated brain apparently couldnโt handle focusing on a voice-only call.
Doesn't mean it's hard to live without the US tech, it means US tech is making live harder.
Swearing off Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney+ and YouTube was also part of the deal โ already eliminating a sizable chunk of my leisure time.
Perhaps the author should look for a hobby?
Also, I see two critical areas where things need to change:
- communication: Just use XMPP. Find a provider in the EU. Fascists can do a lot of damage when they control your communication.
- money: blocking flows of money can hurt us pretty bad and just the US knowing those flows is already bad
all 41 comments