top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 1 day ago

Could you all just stop trying to flee corporate greed jumping from one company to another? We already have XMPP, Matrix and other descentralized solutions.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Oddly enough, once you make that three fiddy payment signal will now potentially have a payment method linked to your account.

    If this is true that payment method can essentially be tied to a identity.

    I suppose the reason they are choosing to do this is to prevent a influx of bot accounts and spammers/scammers.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    And if you are worried about Google's involvement in this, Greyson Parrelli of the Signal team points out that the payment runs through the same zero-knowledge proof setup it uses for donations.

    Looks like there is some way of decoupling the payer identity from the signal user

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 78 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    All the purist here would rather use matrix to send messages to themselves...

    Signal is an amazing alternative to WhatsApp and one of the few apps you can actually get non-techies to install. If it's not for you then don't use but don't say stupid shit like "why would anyone use it? it's not perfect!".

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago

    Actually I was installing signal in my relatives phone to replace the sms app, they used it even without knowing... I understund why they remove the sms part but it was a sad day for me, now noone from my "normies" use it anymore

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    What about Matrix is harder than email?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    The getting people to use it.

    Took me months after issueing my friends and family accounts for most of them to get the concept and install something to log into (I still get complaints about Element, and thats one of the nicer ones).

    For mobile apps, if its not seamlessly integrated into their existing accounts or they have to remember a new password, you might as well have given them a bag of spiders.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    for me, it's that it breaks randomly. all. the. time.

    With element, it was constant across two different homeservers I tried. Either logging me out, or just randomly unverifying my client and failing to decrypt messages.

    with fluffychat, it's been more stable, but recently it's taken to logging me and a friend of mine out at random just like Element. After logging back in, it constantly tells me there's an error fetching the notification (even though I'm not launching from a notification) due to the account not existing.

    The protocol feels incredibly fragile, since it seems every implementation trips over the same footguns, and it makes the user experience horrible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Hmm, I bet there’s a hidden 50 cent surcharge. Damn it, Loch Ness Moster, I ain’t giving’ you no tree fiddy!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    I have this in Threema. Thank you

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    it gets worse

    The feature currently requires Google Play Services, as payments run through the Play Store, making it such that devices without Play Services cannot access it

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    From the official announcement

    Can I buy an account on a device that has no Play Services?

    Not yet. We have plans to add more payment methods, but currently only offer Play Store in-app payments, which requires Play Services.

    Ok so given how long it took them to allow an alternative to phone numbers, it will probably be at least 5 years before you can pay using a de-googled phone. I really don't understand what's so hard for them to accept crypto, they already do for donations. Smells like government involvement.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 88 points 2 days ago (35 children)

    You mean they want to identify you from your credit card instead of your phone number? Bah.

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • load more comments (20 replies)
    [–] 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Yeah why am I donating $10 a month every month for them to come up with shit like this. Google? Really? Now I question what else is going on behind the scenes.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    If Signal had zero value to the three letter agencies, they probably wouldn't be allowed to exist. Sucks, but I wouldn't trust them much more than anything else American.

    Honestly, for super secret communications, leave your phones at home and meet up irl.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Signals reliance on phone numbers is my biggest problem with it. I don’t understand why they can’t move away from them entirely.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    You can already today share a username instead of a phone number, this is just extra for signup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    I didn't expect to get cancer from a website called itsfoss.com, but I guess it's time to put an adblocker on my tablet, too.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Deltachat and Jabber, both decentralized encrypted messaging apps (as opposed to Signal, which is centralized), don't even require an email to create an account, let alone a phone number or payment.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Why does a service that no longer does SMS want your phone number?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›