top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 370 points 1 month ago* (11 children)

This leads to the government deciding which websites you can visit and cant visit down the line. This is a dystopian level of control and with surveillance already getting dystopian… Pick your dystopian technology book and decide which one we’re leading towards. Fascism policies are already on the rise in democratic worlds.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 158 points 1 month ago (14 children)

    Great, more boomers who can't understand how the internet works.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 141 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    This doesn't stem from a lack of understanding. It's about corporations and control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 74 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    Choose your DNS provider wisely

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 1 month ago* (13 children)

    And ensure your VPN provider isn’t headquartered in the US (or better yet any five eyes nation) nor one of the ones owned by the Israeli Billionaire Teddy Sagi who likely also has deep ties to the Israeli and US governments

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kape_Technologies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago

    TIL expressVPN started as

    Crossrider started off by making a SDK for the deployment of browser extensions platforms with support for monetizing extensions. The monetization options were used by major [ad injectors which used man-in-the-browser to change or add advertisements to what users saw.

    JFC.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Good lists of vpn providers would be appreciated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Mullvad is zero log and located in Sweden, and accepts payment in crypto to reduce traceable privacy footprint (which frankly is one of the real, relevant use-cases for crypto to further legitimate privacy needs).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 65 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Like this will ever work. lol. Just don’t get VPN from a company that is headquartered in the US. Problem solved. There are a million other ways to bypass this. There will ALWAYS be away, they’re just trying to make it harder for the experienced, and impossible for your average Joe.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 54 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    political theater. won't happen because it's unenforceable.

    • VPNs operate outside of federal control
    • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor which is laughable
    • DNS exists outside of the US

    if this does happen, IF, it has nothing to do with IP rights or protecting Americans. it has everything to do with censoring what the majority of common Americans read online. this is the first step towards blocking news outlets that won't regurgitate whitehouse directives.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 49 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    If piracy was a problem I can find them multiple international corporations that are well know for using copyrighted content to train their LLM without paying for it or having permission from the owner of that content.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 48 points 1 month ago

    This goes far deeper than just "piracy". Everyone's favourite section 1201 of the DMCA also means that this bill will result in the US blocking foreign sites which explain to you how to fix your shit if you have to bypass even the most inane digital lock.

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    US on the way to become a less free country than China lol

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 43 points 1 month ago

    Sounds like another assault on freedom of speech.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    That's the whole point of VPN providers. They're not in your jurisdiction.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    Well, time to protest, and if need be, use the constitution how it was intended.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (16 children)

    Or ... time to set my VPN to Canada.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    I think the intent of the law is that it wouldn't mater. If the VPN blocks the site, you can't get to the site.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Why would a Canadian VPN server obey US block lists?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    It wouldn't, which is why I roll my eyes every time I see a bill demanding what a VPN must do.

    The only way for them to actually enforce this through VPNs is to block VPNs. Which, presumably, they'll do at some point, but with an exception list for companies paying the right license fee to use a Government Approved VPN.

    Which, obviously, will be full of security flaws, and likely won't be HIPPA compliant or other compliances etc, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    I don't know if you're familiar with how VPNs work, but it's basically like a computer in the other country is sharing its internet connection with you.

    So let's imagine that things are reversed, and you're a VPN provider in the United States and you're sharing your internet connection with some computers in another country, like Saudi Arabia, for example.

    And just to be clear, you conduct no business in Saudi Arabia. You're just sharing your internet connection with people from there. You don't have any associates in Saudi Arabia, and you have no intention of ever going to Saudi Arabia.

    And let's say that Saudi Arabia passed a law that said VPN providers had to block some kind of content, like maybe banning all access to content about your favorite band.

    How is this going to affect the VPN service you provide to the other computers?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 42 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Yeah, good luck with enforcing that to foreign VPN providers, you dumb fucks.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Next step is blocking access to foreign VPN providers. They are dumb fucks, but they are persistent dumb fucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Double VPN? VPS in Europe? Tor?

    Life... Finds a way. Piracy too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    And wouldn't you know it, anything that disagrees with the current regime is piracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    We're just not allowed to use computers in any way that actually benefits us, anymore? Digital prison man.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    But surely the whole point of using the VPN is to use one that's outside of U.S authority?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Darrell Issa out of California appears to have proposed this, I assume because he is not seeking re-election.

    Who wants to take a bet he is getting paid for it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    He is getting paid. Not only has the Motion Picture Association contributed to political campaigns but it very recently gave awards and money to two politicians that promote their interests

    For specifics on donations see: https://myreptracker.com/campaign-finance/committees/C00139519/motion-picture-association-inc-political-action-committee-mpaamerica-pac

    In 2025, the MPA gave Chris Coons its Industry Champion Award and also honored Darrell Issa. MPA CEO Charles Rivkin described Coons as a “trusted partner” and praised Issa as a “true partner” on matters important to film and television.

    It’s very basic corruption in broad daylight, and it’s pretty common in US politics today. As far as I know, you can’t prove corruption in court without some form of wiretapping or paper trail, which is trivial for them to avoid. So they’ll never get in trouble for being absolute utter dog shit human beings.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    Ban the RIAA and MPAA.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    My ISP wondering why I only ever access 5 servers in Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and Finland

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    The Corrupt Empire of America at it again.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    I think i2p may see a big uptick in usage then.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago
    [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Time to buy a vps and put wireguard on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›