top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Yeah but what if china invents super duper intelligence what then??

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 19 hours ago

    "Why no one should use Trumps term" duh...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 18 hours ago

    Well, for Trumps level of intelligence, a parrot with a dictionary must look like it's super intelligent.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Watch, next up the Pedo-in-Chief will state that AI (not calling it the stupid ass term dickless made up) needs to be considered people.

    You know, like how businesses are considered people now. You see where this is going...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago*

    The agreements between OpenAI and Microsoft hinge on "super intelligence" specifically. In exchange for billions in early investment, OAI has to share it's model tech with MS until ASI is developed.

    I wouldn't be surprised if all this is just a power play, with OAI bribing trump to get off the hook.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago*

    Look at it from Trump's perspective, though. Even a simple markov chain like eliza is super intelligence compared to what's going on in his brain...

    (No, but seriously, this whole SI thing is really just a scam by his handlers to resell Slovenian domains at an inflated price.)

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    “Stolen intelligence”

    Took everything from everyone without their permission and said “I made this!”

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Wanna know the new term I made?

    Stolen intelligence.

    Pretty good, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Trump is an absolute moron. No one should listen to anything he says, other than his admissions of crimes committed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 2 days ago (10 children)

    It’s not even called AI. Im certainly not calling in SI.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 days ago (8 children)

    I refer to them as either “the LLM” or “the robot” at work and boy howdy the AI bros do not like it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    I refer to them as G.P. This is a somewhat inside joke for those who were in Ontario and watched Tales of the Riverbank on TVO (aka Hammy Hamster) in the 1960's and 70's. Hammy's friend G.P. was a guinea pig. They'd get up to all sorts of adventures. It wasn't a cartoon, but filming of real animals in sets with models and with voice dubbing, and a narrator. They obviously put food down where they wanted the animals to go, and I'm pretty sure they glued the paws to steering wheels and the like sometimes. There was also Martha Mouse, who was clearly a white rat. One time the animals ... oh, but that's another story. (That's how the episodes ended and it was fucking annoying).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    I was starting to think it should be called SI, but short for Simulated Intelligence. Its a good description of these tools, which look intelligent but are not truely intelligent.

    Then Trump came out with his bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    I know this isn't the point of the article, but honestly we shouldn't be using the term "AI" either. By implying that ChatGPT et al are intelligent, even if that's not our intention, we feed into the hype. I found this article proposing alternative, more accurate terms: https://buttondown.com/maiht3k/archive/how-to-talk-about-ai-without-adding-to-the/

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Probabilistic Automation is probably the best term for a majority of what the orange buffoon calls "super intelligence".

    I hate that this went from "we want to detect cancer early" to "steal and monetize everything".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago*

    Good stuff

    artificial intelligence → probabilistic automation

    hybrid intelligence → augmented human intelligence

    image recognition → image labeling

    speech recognition → automatic transcription

    the model shows bias → the model reflects bias

    model mistakes → model errors

    chatbots are good at … → chatbots are good for …

    hallucination → undesirable output

    goal → success condition

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    The first thing I broach on the topic is that there is no intelligence. It is a language model that uses an algorithm to determine speech and conversation. It is limited to whatever it has scraped from humanity and offers nothing further. Each different LLM has its own predilections and tendencies. Some better than others, but all of it is unintelligent and will confidently tell you a wrong answer. Furthermore, it devolves into hallucinations very quickly. What have I missed or what should I add?

    Edit: Article correctly states LLMs should not be anthropomorphized and "hallucination" lends to that. But I feel "undesirable outputs" is too soft even though it does strip the humanity from the LLM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 21 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    It's just marketingspeak from a moron who doesn't understand the tech, or it's capabilities.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    My understanding is that it's a willful scam to sell .si domains. Of course that doesn't mean he came up with it or that he isn't a moron who doesn't understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Maybe we could call it "Stupid Intelligence"?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 2 days ago

    Why No One Should Use Trump's Term

    Because it's what Trump wants and he made it up on a whim. The fact that people are even entertaining the idea enough to write articles about it is asinine.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 days ago

    Freedom Fries moment

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago

    Again: this is a loyalty test to see who all is loyal to Trump.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    And here I am still calling A1.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 days ago
    [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    Because literally every time he says “actually you should call it [x]” it’s the dumbest thing said that day, only surpassed by other stupid shit he might say.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I saw a suggestion I'd like to second: just call it "Trump intelligence"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago

    Call it special intelligence and imply it is mentally deficient.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    It would seem like "super intelligence" when you're as mentally incapacitated as Trump or MAGA. So would a stale quiche, but I digress.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    His little robot worshippers will.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago

    During his announcement about this the phrase “Artificial makes it sound fake.” I’m sitting at home thinking “thats because it is fake!”

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I swear this fucking buffoon should have just been an explorer or something with how much he just loves naming shit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago

    Because it's both cringe and inferior to the actually correct and already popularized term, Virtual Intelligence.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Yes. Now we need people with more money and more of a platform to say this.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago

    Cnet is now classified as a terrorist organization

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago*

    AI is no intelligence None what so ever. You don't really belive these agents that are doing all this 'hacking' are doing it without human input? Do you? If you do I got a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›