DISCLAIMER: I'M NOT FROM USA.

From the outside looking in, it seems like at least half of the inaction of the "left" is because ol' Chucky just hinders everything.

"We wrote a strong letter" was probably the first time I actually, genuinely didn't understand how he's still the leader of the party.

Since then I've done some digging, and it seems like the guy is actually quite delusional. Not even his imaginary friends vote for him, which is kinda sad. Understandable though.

Now he's talking about voting on whether they should block the military action in Venezuela. The ongoing one. The one that's been planned publicly for months.

So, how does he still have his job?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 96 points 10 months ago (15 children)

The Democrats are cowards and fucking terrible politicians. They’re also owned by big money as much as the Republicans.

The entire US Congress except like 4 people needs to fucking go. Not just Schumer.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 41 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    That's a fair point. Almost seems like a two-party system is fundamentally flawed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Yeah it’s part of the problem. I think it’s exacerbated by the fact that the US basically legalized bribery with Citizens United.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Fairness doctrine being abolished was the end of America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    People give the fairness doctrine too much credit; First it’s partially responsible for the current mentality of all opinions matter no matter how stupid. But more importantly it only ever applied to broadcast TV and Radio, not cable or satellite, or the Internet. So it never would have applied to Fox News, for instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It's not a silver bullet, but it was a very useful way to ensure people didn't become radicalized by just listening to one side lie constantly. There's a reason why Reagan and Nixon wanted it gone, and we're living through the repercussions of not having it now; radicalized far right extremists everywhere and in control of the government. Also, we could have made updates to expand it or introduce new legislation to curb extremism on other platforms.

    Definitely far from perfect but better than our current reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    On the contrary, lots of people were radicalized by hearing people like new age healers given the same airtime as medical doctors.

    It’s taken 20 years to fail at making the publicly funded internet a utility. The purpose of the doctrine was to govern publicly owned airwaves. I strongly believe it would have been and is impossible to expand the FCCs jurisdiction to include privately owned networks. I also strongly believe that the current administration would abuse the fuck out of these regulations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yet here we are, with some people believing vaccines cause autism and the far right extremists to boot. I personally would've taken more idiots harming themselves with their new age junk than what we got.

    Don't misunderstand, I agree it absolutely wouldn't have been a catch all and even in its time it lacked the teeth to do much but at least it was something. It combined with a stronger education system could've prevented a lot of what we're dealing with now.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 38 points 10 months ago

    The simplest explanation is that the oligarchs have assured him he'll continue getting his salary if he continues being ineffective.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 10 months ago

    because the capitalists like him there

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Fun fact Chuck Schumer doesn't even pretend that he works in favor of his Democratic constituents. No Chuck Schumer's entire career is based off of serving the needs of the Baileys. A fictional couple he invented that he bases all of his ideals rhetoric and legislation around. They are Republican. Look this up if you never heard before it's the weirdest fucking thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    His job is U.S. Senator, which he holds because he received the most votes from the state of New York. “Senate Minority Leader” is a position he holds because no one else wants it. It’s not a Constitutional position, like Speaker of the House or President of the Senate, and the U.S. Senate is a house of equals. Being “minority leader”bestows no added power, only responsibility for representing his party when negotiating with the other party. If another Senate Democrat wants to be responsible for negotiating with a senile man-child, they can call for a vote whenever the minority caucus meets.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    And like Pelosi, he received the most votes from the state of New York because, "That's our guy!" We gotta fight these people where they live.

    Mitch McConnell had the game down pat. He'd campaign like hell in Kentucky, be damned what the rest of the US thought of him. He's shaken the hands of 10s of thousands of little old ladies who say, "That Mitch sure is a nice man!" (got that last bit from an article about how he worked his campaigns, not making it up)

    Jesus, if lemmy only knew about Orrin Hatch or Robert Byrd (KKK member!). 🙄 Those dirtbags lasted for decade after decade after decade by appealing to their constituents, not the US as a whole.

    Former House Speaker Tip O'Neill: "All politics is local."

    Side note, Mamdani has this game figured out! Except he went out and listened to his voters, of all sorts. Fascinating man to watch. No talking points shoe-horned in as replies, no sound bites, legitimate listening skills and answers. Bill Clinton was such a master. We will watch his career with great interest!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    which he holds because he received the most votes from the state of New York

    Technically?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Technically, he's in office because he won an election. But he did that by being in the pocket of numerous lobbies and in the good graces of the Democrats' campaign operation. If you don't do those things, your odds of winning are vanishingly small. So he's borderline untouchable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    How did Mamdani take NYC against a filthy-rich opponent (Cuomo) with literal billionaires and the national conservative machine standing against him?

    AOC was a bartender and took her House seat, untouchable now.

    Obama was a nobody from Illinois. People heard him speak at the 2004 Democratic National Convention (me included!) and jumped onboard.

    Clinton took the Presidency as an unheard-of governor of a hick state nobody cared about. And a Democrat in that state no less!

    They all did it without big money, against wealthier opponents and won by talking to their people and listening. The formula works.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    The fact of the matter is that if Democrats had been elected, there would have been no invasion of Venezuela, nor Iraq two decades ago.

    Let us not kid ourselves. Non-voting eligible American voters let trump take the reins again, with control of Congress and the Supreme Court, knowing he could pull shit like this at any moment, yet still sat on their lazy asses TWO Election Days, fondling their purity, bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL, and now they're like... "C'mon Schumer... dazzle me and my most excellent purity over here!"

    Elections have huge consequences, so spare us the righteous outrage. Whatever blood gets spilled, it's also on those soft, tender, lily-white hands of non-voting deadweights.
    Also, twice is a pattern: "Vote for a woman?!! Me?!! When PIGS FLY!!!"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    There hasn't been a single war that the DNC hasn't been bloodthirsty to get into. Iraq was bipartisan and Biden expanded the bounty on Maduro to $25m. House Democrats just gave $8b more in funding than what was requested for war.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Correct. Instead, dems would have declined to roll back any of those laws "so we have something to campaign on next time" until voters get fed up with their ineffectiveness and vote R next time. THEN, we get the invasions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Biden increased sanctions on Venezuela.

    During the Venezuelan election, when the US-backed opposition leader said that he wouldn't give the oilfields back to the US, Biden had their financial support cut off and arrested opposition members living in the US.

    The Venezuelan policy is bipartisan.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    When you consider that the Democrats' job is to offer only token resistance and lose elections, you realize he's doing his "job" very well.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    It’s pretty simple really he gets money from Israel and the oligarchs to pretend he’s opposed to things in the weakest and least convincing way possible. He’s doing a good job at the job of pretending to be opposed to facism while preventing any movement left so he continues to get paid to do that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    This is, sadly, how it seems to be. Both he and Hakeem Jeffries seem to obstruct real opposition from the Democratic Party against Trump and the Right in any meaningful way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago*

    Think of it like a ratchet mechanism. He's not there to move things left, he's there to keep things in place while the right takes a little break to twist up the tension even more.

    That's how the left works in the US now: They're not actually there to create change or movement, they just hold the place and keep things from moving until the right can get back in power. They don't do anything but act as a placeholder for real change - they hold their position until the right puts their screws into things again and twists us further to the right.

    It's...ridiculously obvious once you notice it.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    They're the party of the status quo. They'll probably take 50 years to reinstate the rights lost by this administration.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    Major chunks of the country will always vote for the same party. That's why you hear talk about blue states and red states. He's in a safe area, so he has a negligible chance of losing even if he does a terrible job.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    .. because he was elected.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    How does/did Schumer, Grassley, Graham, Pelosi, McConnell, Feinstein, and so on, stay in power? I always get downvoted and naysayed when I say this, but American voters fucking suck. Just the absolute worst. People will blame the two party system, and they do have a point there, but those same people don't show up in the primaries to make a difference. They're too scared to vote for change, as they've shown over and over. Just a bunch of ignorant, self-satisfied, cowards.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    We did show up to the primaries enough to make a difference in 2016. We voted for Bernie Sanders as our candidate. The DNC told us all to go fuck ourselves, they're a private institution, they can do whatever they want, the votes are just a formality, and appointed Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate instead.

    Please, tell me more about how it's fault of the voters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Ah, I thought that Hillary ended up getting more votes. I must be wrong. I'm in no way denying the fuckery that went along with it, from the DNC to media doing everythign they could to keep Bernie out, but in the end, voters are the ones who vote. Tell me again about how it's not ultimately the voters. And most tellingly, we weren't discussing the presidency, which is a whole bag of issues, but Congressional representation. Fucking voters 100%.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    AFAIK he was OK during Trump's first term, back then it was Pelosi holding back.
    Now he is making the same mistakes Pelosi did.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    His leadership position was voted on before the DNC chair.

    So his threats to cut off funding to the state of any Dems that wouldn't back him still had some teeth.

    It doesn't now, mainly because the DNC immediately jumped into the largest twin esture into state parties, ever.

    He's been a lame duck all but maybe a month of this senate leadership term, and will almost certainly lose it next year.

    If he doesn't, it's a bad sign.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    His job is to lose and stall when instructed to by nazis, and he is a goddamn genius at doing it (though a dumbass for failing to see how dumb it is to do that)

    Point is, he's doing his job: losing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    The problem is simple. Congress and Senate treat their job like jobs. Not sworn duties.

    At the end of the day they don't give a damn about the USA and will always accept checks from special interest.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Gerrymandering criminals.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    The Baileys' votes each count as 100,000+ votes

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    politicians are the least accountable poeple in Murica (probably in the continent)

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›