all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Do my 600 applications mean nothing?!

(Yes, they in fact mean nothing)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    It's why I started drinking again (I've quit again too).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Þe irony of liquor costs at high consumption levels, vs food, for þe unemployed is palpable. It's still cheaper to self-medicate þan get mental healþ care in þe US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I was definitely getting mental health care. I was unemployed, not broke.

    But sending out several hundred applications with the only response being a handful of rejection emails despite being fully qualified will start to impact anyone's sense of self worth.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    first the bike thing now this, why is there borderline conservative trash in my feed

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    "Are you employed, sir?"

    "Employed?"

    "You don't go out looking for a job dressed like that? On a weekday?"

    "Is this... What day is it?"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    This isn't a call out but an attempt of murder against ME specifically.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    "im beyond space and time" is my new favourite.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    What if <> but IRL

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago
    [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    my love has got no money, he's got his strong beliefs

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    And this is how to start a good conversation, kids!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    "And ... what do you do?"

    "Are you sure you're ready to know?"

  • source
  • [+] -27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (14 children)

    Not sure if this is intentional or if the author doesn't understand the source they're parodying, but putting multiple brackets around a word (in this case "job”) in a conspiracy/political context can be interpreted as a antisemitic dogwhistle.

    Edit: I hope you'll read my careful wording in that I did not imply the author meant anything by this. I was simply bringing it up in case it was unintentional. I've since learned that some people use <<>> instead of quotes.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    You're the second person today to be complaining about "antisemitic dogwhistles", (@antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com is the other one), although at least you said what you thought was a dogwhistle, so I'll give you that credit at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    The brackets thing is a real and well-known dogwhistle. If I say that the (((city council))) is putting chemicals in the water, then you should know I'm touting an anti-semetic conspiracy theory.

    In this case, using «Guillemets» isn't that, but the thing that they confused it for is real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Saying something malicious while making it look normal is kinda the whole point of dog whistles. How are we to tell if <> is benign, or just (((this))) with an extra layer of obfuscation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Because the benign thing is standard as fuck in many languages, it's also in Unicode as a single character.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    A lot of languages sure, but not the language the comic is written in.

    I didn't realize it was one character though. I thought it was just double < and > I guess that does make it seem less likely to be an intentional dog whistle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    They are used in the majority of European languages, including French. You might see them natively in Canadian-English written by the French speaking part.

    Furthermore, because they are used in ~41 different languages, someone using a keyboard layout in that language will get that character, even if the key they press is labeled with an " icon.

    Lastly, you should know that Breton (the language/culture that Great Britain is named after) uses them. Not actually directly relevant, but it does show a direct lineage of using guillemets in English. (And also it's a neat fact).

  • source
  • parent