this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1061 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22815 readers
3047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 5 days ago

I fail to see how that is a bad thing.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 266 points 1 week ago (5 children)

He doesn't give a shit about the mass starvation, shantytowns, global economic depression, and rise of Nazism into the largest war in human history that left hundreds of millions dead. No, he's worried because his party wasn't in power.

Fuck yourself with the largest, sharpest cactus that exists on the planet, you slimy, snivelling pathetic excuse for a fucking human, Rand Paul.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh no, what if democrats gain power and give us all healthcare and actually take care of the sick and poor. Wouldn’t that be terrible?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Oh no, what if democrats gain power and give us all healthcare and actually take care of the sick and poor. Wouldn’t that be terrible?

It would be unexpected.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 150 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I wish American Voters had memories longer than 4 years. But they don't.

They got pissed at Bush and the Republicans in 2006 for the war and in 2008 for crashing the economy.

And 2 years later in 2010 they voted in a red wave not seen since reconstruction.

Donald Trump tried to overthrow the government and 4 years later they gave him another chance. If Trump shot a crowd of people on 5th avenue the kids of the victims would vote for him 4 years later.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There were massive voter suppression campaigns in both those election cycles. And it doesn't help that the neo Liberals highjacked the democratic party, marginalizing labor. People are not motivated to vote for the lesser of two evils.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (41 children)

People are not motivated to vote for the lesser of two evils.

Neoliberals and centrists need to get this through their firewall of condescencion towards leftists, no matter how much y'all hate leftists (and laugh at leftists with your more conservative friends) you need to understand the average person in the US hates you and your leaders far more than than they hate genuine leftists that actually fight for the working class instead of spitting on them and publicly calling them stupid.

load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Your treating this as if the same people are voting different ways. It's usually much more along the lines of voters staying home one election and voting in another.

Edit - autocorrect got naughty!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works 123 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I've stopped believing there is anything that will make people stop voting Republican

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lack of elections could….

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 118 points 1 week ago (28 children)

The Republican party deserves to die for allowing Donald Trump to rise to power. The Democrat party deserves to die for being useless to stop them. America needs a whole new fresh start with new parties

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Notice that's their top concern. Not hurting Americans, not pissing off allies, not a recession, not handing off the title of World Superpower to China, but losing their jobs is their top concern.

*losing power over others not just theor jobs

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 88 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Don't threaten me with a good time!!!

Also, it's a wheel. The Cons ruin the economy, voters get mad and vote Democrat, Democrat fixes economy, voters don't like the spending even though it's improving everything so vote Con, the Cons ruin the economy, ect ect so on and so forth

[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Democrats get penalized for not fixing it fast enough or good enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 68 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wouldn't that be nice.

Nicer would be the utter destruction of the Republican Party, followed by a split between the Corporate Democrats and Progressives into two parties.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago

Sure is telling that his biggest worry is republicans losing power and not the sort of fucking depression that was the cause last time.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago

We Lost the House and Senate for 60 Years.

I sure fucking hope so, you piece of shit.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hopefully the republicans can go the way of the whigs, the democratic party can become the conservative party they so desperately want to be, and we can create an actual party on the left.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] enkille@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not happening. There won't be another legit election.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Considering the rampant gerrymandering, the fucked system that's the electoral college, this past election having widespread voter intimidation, destruction of mail-in ballot collection boxes...was the last one a legit election? How long has it been since there was one?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (8 children)

What does he expect. Libertarianism is basically enacting the policies that led to the great depression. Trump is reacting in the way that made it worse, but you are the kerosene to his spark. Expect great depression when you get what you want.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 44 points 1 week ago (36 children)

Republicans should be wiped out. Fools, monsters, and traitors. They've done incalculable damage to the world and all those who live here.

Every Republican that dies should be cause for celebration.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] DebR@mstdn.social 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Their plan is to not have fair elections anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What's really happened is we've had our global dominance thrown away. We took the lead because of WW1 and WW2. It's not because we're great. It's not because we manifested our destiny to become the leader of the world. It's because factories in Europe were bombed to smithereens. That's what allowed the U.S to achieve financial dominance. Now we're in the fall.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What will probably happen is a one or two term slump. What's different between then and now is the internet and social media, which fills most people's brains with a deluge of noise. In addition to the effects of misinformation daily telling people that the moon is the sun, most algorithms prioritize novelty, and nothing's more novel than the most stupidly wrong-headed take. We constantly hear the opinions of people who should be laughed out of the room! We sit and chuckle, but there's tens of millions of people who have poor media skills who it can actually influence.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

Of course that’s all he cares about. Fuck him, I hope he loses everything he holds dear.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Truman’s campaign against the “Do Nothing” Republicans is not the cause, but it’s when these huge majorities for Democrats got cemented in place for decades:

Isolationism is not dead. Far from it. Even if the Republicans get a presidential candidate with a good record in foreign affairs, he will not be able to drown out the raucous isolationist outcries of the rest of the party. And that prospect is beginning to scare the voters--and it ought to scare them.

Now, we can always rely on the Republicans to help us in an election year, but we can't count on them to do the whole job for us. We have got to go out and do some of it ourselves, if we expect to win.

The first rule in my book is that we have to stick by the liberal principles of the Democratic Party. We are not going to get anywhere by trimming or appeasing. And we don't need to try it.

The record the Democratic Party has made in the last 20 years is the greatest political asset any party ever had in the history of the world. We would be foolish to throw it away. There is nothing our enemies would like better and nothing that would do more to help them win an election.

I've seen it happen time after time. When the Democratic candidate allows himself to be put on the defensive and starts apologizing for the New Deal and the fair Deal, and says he really doesn't believe in them, he is sure to lose. The people don't want a phony Democrat. If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign.

But when a Democratic candidate goes out and explains what the New Deal and fair Deal really are--when he stands up like a man and puts the issues before the people--then Democrats can win, even in places where they have never won before. It has been proven time and again.

-Harry Truman, Address at the National Convention Banquet of the Americans for Democratic Action, May 17, 1952

https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/public-papers/129/address-national-convention-banquet-americans-democratic-action

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

But you'll do nothing to stop him.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep. It also got a democrat elected 4 terms as president. Tax rates climbed up to 95+ percent for millionaires.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (8 children)

And you know those good times that conservatives say they want to go back to? Those times when a blue collar worker could earn enough to buy a house, pay the mortgage, support a stay-at-home-wife and family, and then send those kids to college? That's the society that those decades of democrat control led to. That's what another 60 years of democrat dominated congress could lead to again. In fact, a huge blow out election like that may be the only thing that can save, not only this nation, but maybe even the whole world, if it's not too late already.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago

Both you and Mitch McConnell are the reason he's here

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I sometimes have this weird fantasy where Trump is an actual genius, and his plan all along was to destroy the Republican party. I imagine him sitting on the crapper with a McDouble in one hand and his phone in the other, trying to come up with the most insane tweets he can, getting frustrated that his plan is taking so long and thinking to himself "why are these people liking this shit? It's obviously bat shit crazy!"

Then I come back down to this Hellscape reality and sigh as I accept that the world is just full of stupid, greedy, selfish people, and Trump is an avatar for all the worst human impulses, and that tens of millions of people would gladly follow him off a cliff so long as they get to drag the rest of us over the edge with them.

I truly hate this place.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Wiping out the Republicans? I don't see a downside with that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Man if only he could like vote to get rid of them or something. too bad he's literally powerless and can't do a thing to stop this. /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In a perfect world you will never again be in power. Ever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I used to be a swing voter before Trump, after this admin, I will never vote for a Republican again. Especially since most support him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also during those 60 years....recovering from the big depression, dust bowl and gaining human rights....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago

I guess I'm glad he thinks that elections will still matter.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

…then f*cking impeach, you imbecile…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›