The way AIs escape is simple. They're trained on vulnerabilities and lots of technical commands, e.g. nmap. A prompt tells them to do something and they use their repertoire of training to discover, achieve and do the thing they're asked to do. It's not thinking per se, so much as chaining together of things. The problem is they do this stuff systematically and quite clearly in a way that finds a lot of vulnerabilities
post
thing is they didnt even put any brakes on instead they put it on neutral on top of a hill and then blamed the car for going rogue and not even using the brakes.
Oh, absolutely not.
This is missing one step: actually push the car down.
All these "rogue" LLMs were told to do what they did.
Nerd here.
Damn good summary, but by saying "you pull the parking brake" I took it as setting the brake, as in on. Should say "you release the parking brake."
'pull' comes from the olden times when you, in fact, did pull a handle to release the parking brake.

Fair- but since then it's almost always been "pull" to set the brake. Didn't have that 70s/80s reference when thinking about "AI".

"Pulling" the parking brake sets it, damn it!
I refuse to acknowledge shitbox automatics with an atrophied third pedal that functions incorrectly instead of a proper handbrake lever.
Get off my lawn

Snake oil salesman issued a press release that the snake oil escaped from the bottle and cured people.
The news media completely failed on this, again. There was nothing rogue about these hacks. The companies prompted these systems, provided ample resources and just let them rip. Only to claim they went "rogue" afterwards. And by and large everyone just accepts that, it's driving me insane. I feel like Mugatu every day when it comes to AI reporting.
This just predictive text trying every single kown exploit until it's in. Simple as that
My go to simplification is "They built a robot that hacks software and then placed it in a box that uses software as a lock and then the robot that hacks software hacked the software lock".
Which is both very simple and also about as accurate as you could make it in that many words. The AI's are not 'rogue' it was just solving the problem it was given.
This is disinformation and propaganda. Here is a brief independent investigation one of these cases.
The agents did create exploits and they did find ways to communicate with each other and organized and hypothesized and collaborated together. This is not a car rolling downhill.
People here are delusional. Reality or facts are apparently not important if it's your tribe's ideology in question. Everything for the hivemind lol. No better than climate change deniers or magats.
Accessing a filesystem directory they had the permission to access -> exploit
Connecting to a reachable, passwordless/keyless server -> exploit
Finding credentials to the servers of a company that accidently uploaded their credentials online -> exploit
They did what they were told to do, they just did it in an unexpected way. It's not a car rolling downhill, but it's not "rogue" either.
What this shows is that chatbots can be prompted to work together on hacking projects, but it doesn't imply some kind of agency.
It might help make your point if you don't preemptively start insulting everyone that might disagree with you.
"independent" lol
Just like the "independent" arbitrators and "independent" studies that corporations buy all the time.
Nobody believes this "bro! the Matrix is real!" horseshit. Altman and his gang of tech billionaire co-conspirators have lost the plot. No grasp of reality or how the world works. None whatsoever.
It is very simple, the more advanced the AI, the better it sells.
You hold all evidence of potential "breaches of containment".
Telling everyone that your AI is so advanced that it can breach containment without prompting, puts the spotlight on your AI model.
You can claim that it did fantastic feats to break out, all with pre planned evidence.
The public and regulatory bodies have been in complete AI psychosis mode ever since ChatGPT was released, and only care about how advanced the model is, not how shit your containment was, nor that if true, how reckless it is to keep the model active.
Note that I am not pointing to any one single AI company and saying that they are faking these breaches, I have no evidence of that, I am saying that I don't trust their reporting accuracy, they don't have a good track record of being honest.
I am also angry at how society just seems to eat it all up and ask for more despite the vile aftertaste.
There is no “containment” though. Like, these companies purposefully set the bots loose on the internet. They’re not trying to contain anything. They just use that word cause it sounds like they’re doing something. Any sort of containment would defeat the entire purpose of what they’re trying to sell.
Rogue shrapnel from my hand grenade killed 3 people and injured 5
Like leaving a group of toddlers in a room, unsupervised, with an ample supply of paint, brushes and various tools. Oh yes, they'll go rogue.
Oh yeah? Well, my AI is so smart, it went rogue and broke out of containment and killed a bunch of other AI's and leaked my nudes and emptied my bank account and bombed a peaceful village in the Phillipines and fucked my wife! That's how awesome it is!
Subscribe link below!



top 50 comments