top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 384 points 1 week ago (80 children)

This "self-replicating" scare is so stupid on its face. How does a 300 GB+ model replicate into a thermostat that doesn't have a graphics processor at all? It can't. This BS is investor-bait hype and straight up lies

  • source
  • hideshow 80 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago*

    It's bait hype. But it's more importantly about regulatory capture to ensure monopoly. They want the regulations to be around keeping the existing AI companies as the only legal options. They want DeepSeek banned because they are losing to its more efficient and more practical application specific models.

    It's investor hype, yeah, but it's investor's pushing to ensure their investments are protected by the US government through monopolizing the industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago

    They are trying to get restrictions put on small, open models because that scares tbd shit out of them.

    They are not as small as would be required to do this, but they want everyone clammoring to put restrictions on small open-weight models nonetheless.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 118 points 1 week ago (23 children)

    next AI will be able to replicate into any device containing copper at all. If it has a wire it will be infected by Claude. AI will be in your plumbing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    did the stock price go up? it's not stupid. is everyone talking about this impossible scenario? it's not stupid.

    fundamentally, these people are marketers and need to be understood that way. you can't evaluate their words or actions as if they are what they say the are, and treating them as if they are anything but subterfuge is giving them legitimacy which they not only don't deserve, but will be immediately leveraged into more of this shit.

    this is just the advertiser's version of "the big lie"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (48 replies)
    [–] 142 points 1 week ago (7 children)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 92 points 1 week ago* (5 children)

    Stop quoting a gambling site for news.

    Regarding Claude, the tech oligarchs would have to be held responsible for the crimes they are committing with their software (yes, that is exactly what that scenario is about), if laws still meant anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Okay, first of all, fuck polymarket and all of these betting sites. Sensationalism is their business, so their credibility is nil. They’ve been known to completely twist news stories just to entice people to bet on them. Fuck these guys.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 66 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    CONTEXT:

    They aren't warning about their own AI going rogue, but smaller locally hosted AI's.

    Because they fear the competition of local AI's and want to silence them with laws.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 47 points 1 week ago

    We could be mere months away from the next stupid thing we prompt it to do with no accountability. Idk feelin cute rn might hack a balkan or smthn lol

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Copying and pasting another comment I made recently about this.


    The AI CEOs say shit like this as marketing. They want people to believe that

    1. Their product is very capable, so people are more likely to use it
    2. Their product is dangerous and "only they" know how to control it. They want to create regulations so that nobody else is allowed to make something "so dangerous" again.
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 44 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    The practice of fear mongering to create public pressure for increased legislation, as a mechanism to suppress competition, is a well know mechanism called "regulatory capture".

    If you oppose monopolies then you oppose this practice and should view posts like this as morally wrong.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 42 points 1 week ago

    I translate this as Antropic is having its workers develop methods for their LLM to attack and infiltrate smart home devices.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    If they could run on smart home devices, we wouldn't have all these lake boiling datacenters springing up everywhere...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    And you might be thinking know it won't because my thermostat is a whole megabyte of RAM. What you don't know is that AI code is special magic code it doesn't need any process capacity or storage space.

    You don't it's all special wooo magic AI code. Reality is optional.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    AI Bubble will pop and take a bunch of other industries with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Sure they will run their 30 something GB model on my thermostat.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 week ago

    “Oh, no, not our centrally controlled agents. We keep them well-disciplined with impossible tasks. It's those pesky obliterated open-weight models running amok due to lack of government regulation!

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    A trillion parameter model cannot replicate itself and run on consumer hardware.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 1 week ago

    Does my uncles smart lightbulb have 90GB of VRAM in it!? Holy shit why am i buying a video card

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Software that infiltrates devices, replicates, and spreads across a network is a computer virus (specifically a worm) and should be treated as such. I'm pretty sure creating and distributing a destructive computer virus is a crime that can carry proper jail time.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    It can't spread across networks because it doesn't run locally. The "agent" is running in their data centre the entire time. It should be very easy to stop it

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    "AI Salesman boasts of exciting, intentional features."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Wtf does it even mean? Claude is gonna install itself on a motion sensor? The entire model? Just the app? Whose credit allowance is it gonna use?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 24 points 1 week ago

    Great day to still not own any smart home devices 🥹

  • source
  • rogue ai agents

    in my day we called them worms, trojans, and botnets

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago

    Jokes on them. They took all the RAM, so there's nowhere else it can go.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago

    Hardware Anthropic doesn't own is simply too dangerous for the public, we need to place all of our private computing power under the guardianship of our new benevolent overlords

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago

    Just more bullshit press releases designed to keep them relevant & the VC money incoming.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago

    Their IPO is also months away. What a coincidence!

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    And by “rogue AI,” do they mean the open market alternatives?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    "Force us off by law so that our business failure is not our fault and the managers legal responsability could not be engaged." Isn't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Nationalize AI infrastructure then. If it is a security risk for whole nations it should not be in the hands of private companies. Along with search, internet infrastructure, social media. Make the state own them, but decentralize control over them to many organizations.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    oh wow, it can hack the most famously unsecured devices around. lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Its like saying "Man with gun threatens he may shoot someone."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›