this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
595 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

15937 readers
2164 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WTF

Edit: I wasn't sure what I was appalled by at first but now I realize it's that this fucking medal just encourages women to be treated no better than a prized heifer.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ef9357@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

The truth is that Trump is a poster child for why abortion should not only be legal, but encouraged.

[–] PurpleSkull@lemm.ee 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Ah, here is step one. The "Mutter der Nation" medal for women having 5+ children.

Next stop: Lebensborn projects where women are forced to get impregnated by real american patriots (tm)

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Blessed be the fruit.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Why do you think he wants to be "The Father of IVF." Musky's little breeding program.

[–] gargolito@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

Another coinkidink.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Trump is the sum of the reasons I won't procreate and can shove every single medal up his rectum to form Trump piñata. However, we can then string him up and take turns beating Trump-yata with a bat until we all get a medal, and the world will be on its way to healing.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Can this medal be exchanged for food and shelter?

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago

That would be communism!

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

ok so this is inconsistent

i read two fucking weeks ago that economists around the world are waking up to the idea that people should have fewer children because otherwise the rich and corporations might have to pay taxes to provide income to the people that the wages don't. if there's fewer people, they don't need to pay people subsidies so much. trump should talk to his economists.


edit: context: wages are predicted to drop so low over the next 20 years that people will not be able to feed themselves on wages alone. social unrest is painful and to avoid it, some sort of Universal Basic Income will be unavoidable. That would have to be paid for by taxes that the rich would have to pay, since literally nobody else has any money. You see where this is going: the rich don't like their wealth to be taxed.

[–] ef9357@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It wouldn’t help unless said economists drew pictures and used simple words. Even then there’s no reason to believe he would understand.

it's worth a try, and better than doing nothing.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

That's what women of child bearing age want and need. A medal. Not jobs, food, housing, security, nor equality.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

goes along nicely with the female celebrity "astronauts" from last week. "Putting the 'ass' in astronauts", They said. "There will be eyelash extensions floating around the capsule", and saying that they were very concerned about their hair in space. Thats is who the republicans need women to be. less concern about the stuff you mentioned, more referring to yourself as a piece of ass who will be required to make a whole lot of babies. Got it?

/s

[–] GreenCavalier@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

Also those child-bearing age women do not want nor need maternity care, and are TOTALLY into receiving a huge hospital bill after giving birth.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

All the best countries did that, and US will be greatest of them all, that is what he will make it. Great it will be made...

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 41 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Jesus fuck, if you want people to have kids, it is not that hard. Remove obstacles. On average, people want to have kids. It's an evolutionary drive. People override that drive when they do not feel secure enough to start a family. Just make that easier. That's it. Make sure people can afford to have kids, that they can provide them a comfortable and safe upbringing, that they can ready their kids to become adults, and that their kids' future seems likely to be bright. How?

Decrease inflation. Subsidize child care. Increase wages and benefits (raise the mimimum wage). Mandate maternity/paternity leave. Make coverage for kids on health, dental, and vision insurance less expensive, or provide medicare for all (or at least all children). Make sure young people can afford good homes off of minimum wage. Make sure good schools are available to everyone by improving public education and providing bussing. Make sure kids are safe in schools with gun control laws. Make sure college/trade schools are inexpensive and accessible. Stablize the economy. Promote good middle class jobs. Avoid war. Fight bigotry. Provide comprehensive sex education and family planning resources including abortion rights so that people can start families when they are ready and promote generational welfare rather than propogating generational poverty.

Notice how damn near all of these things that would increase the birth rate are antithetical to GOP policy though? You want the results, but not the means. You want to offer "medals" for motherhood like a boss offers a pizza party for a record profits last quarter. It's unserious, unhelpful, condescending, insulting, and still leaves new parents struggling to get by. Be better leaders with sensible policies. Maybe then you will get your wish.

[–] tamman2000@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

The GOP wants to have their babies and eat them too

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I would gold this comment if I could!

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 24 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Wait so we have too many immigrants but not enough babies?

What's going on?

[–] jabeez@lemmy.today 19 points 10 hours ago

Sounds about white.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Keep track, we have too many of some immigrants, but not enough of some other immigrants. We have a tariffs on some stuff, but other stuff you don't need to worry about. We support babies and infants sometimes, but not other times, but we ALWAYS hate China. That's 2025!

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 18 minutes ago

That's project 2025

[–] OmgItBurns@discuss.online 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like I missed part of the article where it said that the current administration was planning on distributing this medal. What I read was more along the lines of them saying that the current administration is potentially implementing some pronatalist policies and the it describes one policy promoted by a pronatalist group, but nothing about the current administration planning on implementing that specific policy.

Not saying any of this is good and I tend to mentally gloss over parts of text that I read, I'm just earnestly missing where it says that specific policy is one that is being looked into and I would appreciate someone pointing it out to me.

You're not wrong. The link seems to be based on a couple who are very pro-babies sending the idea of the mother medal to the Trump administration. Then, the article talks about how conservatives are trying to change the national dialogue about having kids and showed several quotes posted on social media saying why having babies is great.

The author of the article seems to be the one who made the link. They probably aren't wrong, but it wasn't the Trump admin who came up with it or started talking about it.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Your masters want you to breed.

Whether you can afford to have children or not.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Especially when you can't afford their education. Those are the best kind of voters.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

Augustus did this 2000 years ago. Dictators can only imagine so far.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 146 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (18 children)

Governments are always offering weird wacky incentives for women to have children, when the solution is usually patently obvious: you can increase fertility by making it easy and affordable to have children. Stipends for food, paid maternity/paternity leave, free childcare services, affordable housing, and a good economy with an abundance of high-paying jobs.

I mean... there's a reason the baby boom happened in the 50s! But no, that would be socialism!!

[–] nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're forgetting the marital rape, financial dependence on men, lack of choice, sexist culture and general helplessness and misery of women involved in creating the 'baby boom'.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

Were those new problems that didn't exist before the 50s?

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Germany has most of these and a low birth rate.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You still need 2 working parents, few people want to balance a career and children. We're not designed for it. And their social help, while good for global standards, amounts to a fraction of the cost of having kids. In prehistory a whole village raised children and people barely worked. Social policies help but we need a global structural change.

Yes, the social support structure is essential. If you have extended family for example; that will help you out a lot with costs and care. Families are small, atomized and fractured today.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But that'd hurt billionaires.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Nooo not the billionaires!

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Someone think of the poor billionaires!

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

comes with bag of onions.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

the US Government is bought, paid for, and owned by the Russian Mafia. So much so that the Subordinate tries to emulate the master in every facet now.

[–] delgato@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

This is the more accurate comparison. Yes, Trump’s government is like nazi Germany in many respects but the pronatalist movement is straight out the Putin playbook.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago

Meloni copying this (once more, as Italy has already done it many times, since the 1920s) in 3...2...

load more comments
view more: next ›