top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 139 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

It’s incredible how people just don’t understand how tariffs work, but believe an aging man with early onset dementia’s and wears a diaper.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    he's one of their peers, at least in the 'education department'.

    "Donald Trump was the dumbest goddamn student I ever had." - William T. Kelley, Marketing Professor, Wharton School @ UPenn

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 69 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Tariff charges are paid by the importer, not the exporter. Adding huge tariffs to Chinese manufactured goods can only hurt American companies who rely on Chinese engineering and manufacturing expertise.

    This is a charge that American companies will have to pay and it is the people of the US who will foot the bill for additional costs.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I watched a 3 hour video the other day about how this has killed affordable PC computing in the US, and there's no undoing the damage now. The effect is on a time delay based on the material supply chain and will hit soon.

    Reference: https://youtu.be/1W_mSOS1Qts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Hearing it from real people running the real companies we’re used to hearing about in reviews or even being a patron of, really helps bring the reality of what’s happening front and center. Its also fascinating seeing the insulation of the larger companies like Corsair and how different but also alike they speak about the uncertainty of the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I get what they're saying but I think the "Paid for by the government of canada" might be misinterpreted...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    These Tariffs are not approved by Congress, so they are taxation without representation.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That’s not quite what that phrase means, but I like the spirits

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Thank you for running these, Canada! Too many of my fellow Americans are clueless about tariffs and how they are taxes that Americans pay. While the MAGA cultists are lost, there are many others who would have voted against Donvict Dementia if they knew what a tariff was back in October/November 2024. It helps now too because Republican Senators like Mike Lee and John Curtis need to be pressured to impeach donOLD Krasnov, for the benefit of both the States as well as our dear Canadian friends. It's appalling to see Republicans who pretend to be against unnecessary taxes supporting or standing silent on an issue that Republicans used to be solidly AGAINST.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How does anyone with an IQ above 70 not know this?? Are these billboards really necessary? What do they think tariffs are if not for a tax?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    I work with tariffs daily but there are tons of people who are clueless. I think if you quiz the average person on the street and ask them how tariffs work, most of them will fail to define it correctly. A surprisingly large number don't know it's a tax on the importer. A surprisingly large number don't even know it's a type of tax.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    Silly Canada. You’re not suppose to say that you put up the billboard. You’re suppose to run it through a various political organizations like “Americans For a Better Future” or American Families for Prosperity“.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The Republican when they see this: "yeah but JJOOOEEEEE BIIIDEN!"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I hope this is a billboard on the Canadian side of the border that's pointing towards the US.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    The fact that it says "Paid for by the Government of Canada" will allow them to shrug it off as propaganda and go "Why would Canada care so much if this was true!?". I like the idea, but I fear it might have an even more polarizing effect...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Are these billboards in the USA or Canada?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    They aren't, though specifically for groceries, it's somewhat-less relevant for the US than Canada, because we produce a wider variety of food domestically.

    There are some important things that we do import, which have been discussed on here, like out-of-season fruits and vegetables.

    kagis

    These guys highlight several fields:

    https://www.eatingwell.com/foods-impacted-by-new-tariffs-11712453

    • Tropical Produce

    the US consumes more than it has tropical regions to grow tropical foods in.

    • Seafood

    • Coffee

    • Olive Oil, which we mostly get from Europe. "The U.S. produces only 2% of the olive oil that it consumes"

    • Chocolate

    • Nuts (though IIRC we're a major producer of some important nuts, like almonds and peanuts).

    Also, the foods that we're especially competitive in tend to be bulk, low-value stuff, grains and such, which is the staple stuff that you'd really need if prices went up. We tend to import stuff like luxury food from Europe, which is nice but something that one could live without if one's budget was tight.

    One impact will come from fertilizer, which we import a lot of; that'll drive up our cost of production of food.

    The fact that we're a major exporter of food is actually a major reason why you'd expect the agriculture industry to be unhappy with Trump, though agricultural states tended to vote for him. American agriculture is, by-and-large, globally-competitive. If it were uncompetitive, then tariffs might benefit it, providing useful protection from competition by forcing American consumers to buy it rather than more-competitive foreign products. And despite the lack of benefit, the agriculture industry likely does get hit by countertariffs.

    The industries that will tend to benefit from tariffs are those where America isn't very globally-competitive in 2025, maybe low-skill, labor-intensive manufacturing, and that's where consumers are going to take a price hit from taxation. Clothing prices, for example. We're not very good at hand-producing clothing. Tariffs will cause those industries to be subsidized by transferring money from the industries that we're better at.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Hell I just got back from the grocery store a few hours ago. It's hitting already. Just from 2 weeks ago when I last went stuff has gone up.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Apparently these are real, but many have rotated out.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›