Shouldn't it be trivially easy to demonstrate "prior art" in this case, making the patent invalid? I guess that requires someone to get into a legal battle with Nintendo... but it's not like this is some niche mechanic. Surely there are other entertainment megacorps who are currently in violation of this "patent" and do have the resources to fight it in court.
post
Fuck Nintendo, and fuck US copyright
Like the other guy said it's a patient. I don't know why these days it seems like the patent office is allowing patents for vague concepts, But it needs to stop. The entirety of the video game industry is built on itineration of ideas and concepts that came before. How much longer before they try to patent jumping?
copyright
This isn't a copyright, but rather a patent.
Same shit, different spicing.
Arguably copyright is worse.
People literally die of preventable diseases due to patents. I can't find any news regarding the last time some nutjob died because they couldn't torrent Sham'alyan's Avatar movie.
I find it doubtful they'll successfully enforce this in court. But you never know.
The fact that this patent was issued is further proof our "intellectual property" laws and such are fucking broken to all hell, in any case.
Shouldn't take them long to patent the concept of "game".
I don’t know what went wrong that such a patent was granted. I absolutely loathe IP people.
Someone got paid, guaranteed.
This patent could have a chilling effect, but there's no way it would stand up in court. They can still use it as a bargaining chip. Court cases are expensive. And if you don't have a legal department, they are also a personal drain. But that's small fry. Financially, I don't believe it makes sense for them to resort to criminality to get such a patent. Maybe they hope it will influence their court case in Japan against Palworld?
Sort of the point though. If they take a small creator to court, they can just bankrupt them through expensive legal proceedings, and because they do have the patents the judge is unlikely to throw the case out
Yes, absolutely. And there is money in patent trolling. I just don't see the business case here. Why damage the Nintendo brand with such shenanigans when you could leave the patent trolling to some formally independent company. Maybe I just underestimate how much money can be made by shaking down small devs.
It certainly seems that the patent office had discovered how lucrative kick backs can be.
What are we patenting this week Nintendo.
-
Characters throwing ball shaped objects.
-
Characters named after trees.
-
Monsters who only say their own names.
-
Opposite colours, gems, letters or whatever other bullshit we use to name the latest rehashed
cashgrabuhh i mean, game... -
Cute animals.
This list will go on.
This battle system was in use by final fantasy before pokémon though, wasn't it? Also summoning was used in at least the 4 ff games that I have actually played.
They can't copyright the legal system. 🤦♂️
Court summons and legal battles.
You can thank good ole Walt Disney and his lawyers for first pissing all over the public domain laws and then throwing as much of his weight as he could behind increasing the penalties for copyright infringements.
I think palworld needs to start filling for ridiculous patents, go on the offensive.
Someone's about to get chocobo-kicked:

God there's so many companies that operate in Japan that will have problems with the summoning one alone. Square soft leaps to mind

all 44 comments