top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 170 points 10 months ago (20 children)

Just take those exact characters, give them different hair colors, match the personality to the hair color, boom you got a slice of life show that has a strong first season but then fades in quality and takes a weird turn in season 2+3 before a mediocre season 4 that fans try to justify but everyone really hates.

WyVvqrKmOYMVCaC.jpg

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    I really wish there was more evolution in anime. I used to like it a lot but I've grown to really dislike the art style because it's so homogenous. I'm sure I'm missing out on great stories but I'm so damn bored of cookie cutter kawaii characters

    I know that's not every anime so no need to reply with the exceptions to the rule. The two most popular styles are "generic anime" (this) and "chibi anime" (creepy/gross)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    Mahou shoujo Madoka magika is one fantastic story. And only 12 episodes or 2 movies (they are the same, just less OP/EDs).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 82 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 72 points 10 months ago (29 children)

    ... and people get mad at me when I say this now bog standard, seemingly literally standardized anime art style is uninspired, boring, and fundamentally problematic.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    Unrelated: did you know that the term "bog standard" comes from the term "box standard" which means, essentially, vanilla. No modifications or additions, just the basic version in the box. This used to be on the boxes for things people bought.

    Now it basically means the same thing but to a none native speaker bog standard would likely not make much sense, where box standard has the context in the term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I genuinely did not know that.

    Makes complete sense though!

    ... and yes, English is a ridiculous nonsense language, we can and routinely do things like verb(ify) nouns, we have tons of idioms and slang that well... barely even make sense to many native speakers... we have tons of homophones like threw through, their there they're... etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 62 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Oh really? Have you ever seen a person in the shape of a rhomboid?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    But those are the same picture...

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    No. They are very much not. All are rather fit though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 10 months ago

    I think this would be incrementally less ridiculous if they hadn't, presumably, scaled the images causing them all to be the same size/height on the page.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (36 children)

    Don't forget to give the eyes 10x the surface area of what's biologically possible

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago* (17 children)

    In a lot of Asia, youth is seen as attractive

    Human eyeballs are generally all the same size, regardless of skull or body size.

    Youth = small

    Big eyes and small everything else therefore means cute

    Art often exaggerates or interprets

    Anime is art

    Anime is also not a new medium at all in Japanese, and now global culture, and has had a lot of time to evolve

    I'm not defending it, just explaining it, in case people don't understand, because this is a long-standing and very common complaint/criticism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago* (14 children)

    But we could have like, a whole anime done in the style of Ukiyo-E, for characters design style motifs, for facial and body proportions..

    You could mock up a 3D model and cel shade these to work out how they'd work from different angles.

    This is certainly an exaggerated interpretation of reality.

    It is also certainly Japanese.

    These were also largely seen as depictions of beautiful, desirable people.

    Here, this one's from 1932,

    The eyes are getting bigger, but noses still exist, the facial proportions are actually pretty close to realistic, if not just completely realistic, unlike in the modern standard anime style.

    I dunno, I guess the modern standard anime style is just much much more neotenous (oversized heads, relatively oversized eyes, relatively undersized/unemphaszed noses) because it is meant to appeal primarily to small children, who are themselves neotenous?

    Whereas the consumer base for Ukiyo-E would have been primarily adults?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    "Biologically possible", I mean, quite a few animals have eyes taking up a ton of their headspace. Owls for starters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    ... Unless you are planning on hybridizing an owl and a human, in pursuit of growing your own GMO Waifu...

    I think we can safely assume the scope of the context is 'a human being'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Why are they all pigeon-toed?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I never noticed before that all girls are knock-kneed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago

    That's what I love about Japan, so much variety. >_>

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Having worked with vendors in the print industry, I'm wondering if at least some of this is a scaling issue in the edit. Because the "tall and thin" type is exactly the same height as the rest.

    Maybe there was a version that was more distinct, and a layout guy standardized them without seeing or reading the copy.

    Maybe that's too much benefit of the doubt.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 10 months ago

    thought the title said booty types, I am slightly disappointed (in myself)

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    "well-balanced propotions" that's comic.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 10 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    The second doesn't have the coveted "thigh gap", signaling that you are sufficiently anorexic. The third has the faintest shadow of muscle definition in her biceps and calves. The fourth remembered to wear socks, a thing only tall people do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    that's what "athletic" means?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    I think, they miscounted. It's actually 4 billion body types, not just 4.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›