Gospel of love (europe.pub)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 

[Jesus sits on a rock, speaking]
A new commandβ€―I give you:
Love one another

[an angry character talks back to Jesus]
What if they're something bad like gay, trans, brown, or communist though?

[Jesus is facepalming on his rock]
I don't want to be a messiah anymore

https://thebad.website/comic/gospel_of_love

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 129 points 5 months ago (23 children)

Just a note, Jesus wasn't actually purple even though he is depicted here as such.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 104 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    actually, many scholars today believe jesus most likely was purple, as a result of the water in his body being transmuted into wine. this is why in modern catholic tradition, wine is used to represent the blood of christ.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago* (12 children)

    Guy was a walking DUI, with a BAC of 100%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] [S] 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Of course, canon Jesus reply would be "but we're brown ourselves though?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 54 points 5 months ago
    [–] 42 points 5 months ago (47 children)

    It's amazing that a sect leader that promoted peace and frugality unknowingly created one of the most violent and greedy religions.

  • source
  • hideshow 47 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yes it certainly morphs after Constantine makes it the state religion, rather than a cult.

    I am reading a book on the Baltic Crusades and it was talking about the diametrically opposed ideas of state violence and a pacifist religion. Essentially, pacifism doesn't work as a state policy. The Christian church struggled to decide what violence the state should be able to commit.

    Augustine, thought war could be justified in certain circumstances, one of which was if the following peace created more good than the evil if the war wasn't fought.

    Nowadays, I don't think people even know that Christianity was/is a pacifist movement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    I mean, it should be obvious to Christians today that Jesus repeatedly and consistently made a clear distinction between the "kingdom of heaven" and secular nations. Separation of church and state was absolutely one of the premises the early church worked off of as a teaching of Jesus himself. The idea of a "Christian Nation" is indeed antithetical to the very foundations of Christianity. The early history of Christianity is pretty lost on people today and people are quite unaware of just how drastic the changes in Christianity were in the early 300s, and how gigantic of a deal it was for the Roman state to adopt Christianity at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (28 children)

    Jesus Christ as depicted in the Bible, with near 100% certainty never existed. He was no more real than Harry Potter.
    The absolute lack of evidence of existence for a person claimed to be the most significant person that ever lived, and who performed numerous miracles, means that the only reasonable conclusion is that he never actually existed.

    It would be like if we had zero evidence for the existence of Cleopatra, outside some scriptures written by a superstitious sect, where the earliest were written 2 generations after her death, by anonymous authors, and based only on hear say, and written in a place that it would take weeks to travel to or even months. With zero contemporary or first hand evidence.

    And then imagine Cleopatra performed miracles regularly too.
    AND Cleopatra lived 1 generation before Jesus, and 3 generations before the first "books" of the new testament were written.

    But in difference to Jesus, there are loads of historical evidence that Cleopatra lived. When she lived, where she lived, and who she was. But not only her, also her family, like father and brother are well documented, and several events Cleopatra was part of are also very well documented.

    Add to that that the search for evidence for the existence of Jesus is probably the by far biggest historical and archeological search in history. Spanning almost 2000 years, with massive financing from wealthy Churches especially the Catholic and Mormons have spend insane amounts of money searching for evidence, but not only that, also traditional historical institutions have participated, because they too, despite the absolute lack of reason for it, thought that there ought to be evidence for the existence of Jesus.
    This search we know for sure started already in year 200!! And it was pretty intense for more than 1500 years!!! And the search often included scholars, because they too were deluded.

    And their combined efforts have turned up nothing but fakes created after the fact. Zero actual historical evidence.
    The few pieces (about 3) some claim are evidence are heavily refuted as obvious fakes too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I mean, the idea that a guy made a weird sect, telling people to throw away all of their money (to who?) and performing tricks to pass them as miracles isn't so absurd. There's been a lot of scammers throughput history, he could have simply been one that happened to have a long lasting effect.

    It's far from being the most significant person or whatever, more of a butterfly effect of some dude that wanted to have his own cult.

    Isn't that him the romans were describing it, as a cult gathering people fast? That's probably all it was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I mean, the idea that a guy made a weird sect,

    There is still no evidence of that. It's just moving the goal post, but in reality it doesn't make a difference.
    There are also communications between Christian groups where the personification of Christ is debated, to make it easier for people to understand Christianity.

    t’s far from being the most significant person or whatever,

    Again you are completely missing the point, because according to Christianity Jesus is clearly the moist significant person to ever live, and if the bible was true, that would be a fact, as his existence is claimed to be the salvation of billions of people through 2 millennia.
    So saying he is not, is actually the same as supporting my claim that he never existed.

    Isn’t that him the romans were describing it, as a cult gathering people fast?

    No, Christianity was insignificant until the Romans themselves adopted it for political reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (24 replies)
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 36 points 5 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    As an ex-muslim i can confidently say quran does not tell us to love one another, it tells us to love our muslim brothers and rape, kill, torture everyone else.

    I am just grateful most muslims are delusional people who have never read a single word of their book (in their native language) and live a life nowhere as close to that is depicted in the book. There is a reason why jihadism etc. is more popular in Arabic speaking countries, because they actually understand the thing they are reading.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago

    I've read the Kama Sutra. There's a chapter in there telling you to karate chop your woman in the head. At the end of the chapter, it mentions that some women have died from said move. I don't think it's really the be all and end all of good sex. There's also a chapter on seducing your neighbor's child bride.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    Contrariwise, you are also commanded to love racists, homophobes, transphobes, and authoritarians. You can certainly try to convince them away from those stances, but you are still supposed to be kind, even generous, to the persons.

    Unconditional love can be heartbeatingly hard.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    β€œDID I FUCKING STUTTER?”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Or left handed!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    but what if they voted for Trump?

    .this comment is bait, if you got baited please tell me I'm a piece of shit or something

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    I don't see the problem. Love them and stone them, like the law demands. No need to complicate it any further.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Nothing about all of that in the big book. Now wearing both wool and linen, however...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί